I was reading the e-book and there's something i really don't get. In this picture it shows the person not getting shocked because he's electrically common to the ground, which i understand.
In this picture it shows a guy getting shocked because he's standing in the path of the current, but isn't he pretty much in the same situation as the guy in the last picture, and isn't he electrically common to the ground as well? So I don't understand why he actually gets shocked.
Also, the book says this: "There is no such thing as voltage "on" or "at" a single point in the circuit, and so the bird contacting a single point in the above circuit has no voltage applied across its body to establish a current through it. Yes, even though they rest on two feet, both feet are touching the same wire, making them electrically common." But the book also says later that if you see a downed power line you should stand on only one foot to prevent your body from creating a circuit. Why isn't it the same case as the bird where you can stand on two feet and still be fine?

In this picture it shows a guy getting shocked because he's standing in the path of the current, but isn't he pretty much in the same situation as the guy in the last picture, and isn't he electrically common to the ground as well? So I don't understand why he actually gets shocked.

Also, the book says this: "There is no such thing as voltage "on" or "at" a single point in the circuit, and so the bird contacting a single point in the above circuit has no voltage applied across its body to establish a current through it. Yes, even though they rest on two feet, both feet are touching the same wire, making them electrically common." But the book also says later that if you see a downed power line you should stand on only one foot to prevent your body from creating a circuit. Why isn't it the same case as the bird where you can stand on two feet and still be fine?