Actually I´d say that the dimension is K^-1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elect...stivity_and_conductivity_of_various_materials
Ah, I see. Of course, I missed that part. So not knowing how hot the wire gets we can't say how much it may stretch. Is that at 1 G gravity? Does the length of the run and size of the wire matter (weight of the wire)?Hello,
It's a dimensionless factor.
Interesting.The thermal expansion coefficient is not affected by gravity and is uniform in all directions. It is intrinsic and thus does not depend on scale.
What I'm not sure about is the elasticity. The degree of elongation due to a constant (and one-dimensional) tension might also change with temperature.
[update] I did a bit of research and this appears to be the predominant reason for cable elongation, not thermal expansion, but an increased stretchiness that is reversible with temperature.
Using a real simple model you can see that it probably can be readily seen. Imagine a wire 100 m wire that is perfectly straight. Now take a 100.2 m wire between those same points but that is pulled perpendicular at the midpoint so that you have two straight lines forming a triangle (with the original straight wire). The midpoint is pulled more than three feet away from the original straight line.Yeah, a copper wire expands only 16.6ppm/°C, so a 100°C temperature change would change the length by <0.2%, or <0.2m over a 100m span. I'm not sure you could hardly see that.
There are some alloys that exhibit an extreme example of this.The thermal expansion coefficient is not affected by gravity and is uniform in all directions. It is intrinsic and thus does not depend on scale.
What I'm not sure about is the elasticity. The degree of elongation due to a constant (and one-dimensional) tension might also change with temperature.
[update] I did a bit of research and this appears to be the predominant reason for cable elongation, not thermal expansion, but an increased stretchiness that is reversible with temperature.
Good point, although the real-world difference would be from one sagging curve (a catenary, aka funicular, aka hyperbolic cosine) to another sagging catenary, so it might be harder to detect.The displacement is the height of a right triangle that has a base of 50 m and a hypotenuse of 50.1 m. It works out to about 3.2 m.
Love that! I guess it's still awaiting a practical application. Here's another interesting heat engine:There are some alloys that exhibit an extreme example of this.