Planet 9....

HP... thanks for the comment... whatever it meant... but could you please "pedestrianize" a bit with me, and elaborate on the meaning of the acronyms that you've just used? o_O
Merely expression of my oh-so-humble opinion that scientific discovery and cataloguing of Kuiper belt objects can't compare with Nibiru/PX 'lore' in the ways of sensation, hysteria and utter nonsense (i.e. 'fun')...;)

Very best regards
HP:cool:
 

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,761
he caption said said:
This rendering shows the distant view from teh hypothesized Planet Nine back toward the sun. The planet is thought to be gaseous, similar to Uranus and Neptune. Caltech / R. Hurt (IPAC)
---EMPHASIS ADDED---

OMG! Has @Aleph(0) been 'demoted' to captioning!?:eek::p

Sigh... Inasmuch as discovery of KBOs is hardly 'novel', I 'spose' they must 'spice it up' a bit for the rising generations:rolleyes: -- Alas, poor Science! I knew it well...

TTFN
HP
 

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,761

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,761

... some astronomers have suggested that it doesn’t exist, and that the clustering of objects noted by Brown and Batygin is the result of “observation bias” — since fewer than a dozen objects have been seen, their clustering might be a statistical fluke that wouldn’t be seen among the hundreds thought to exist.

For their latest study, however, Brown and Batygin have added several recent observations of objects, and they’ve calculated that the clustering is almost certainly real — in fact, they found there is only a 0.4 percent chance that it’s a fluke.
 
Top