Well, "exact" has various meanings. One could argue that nothing involving time can be exact.Exact? No, it is a RC controlled circuit, the component variation with temperature and humidity is too great. <snip>
http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/picture.php?albumid=41&pictureid=308
This works well with a CMOS 555, because the output swings rail to rail. The bipolar 555's high level is about 1.4 volts shy of the rail, so the duty cycle will be noticeably greater than 50%.Well, "exact" has various meanings. One could argue that nothing involving time can be exact.
However, this circuit that I copied from Audioguru and which is also in your first link provides very close to 50% duty cycle.
![]()
Frequency will vary with temperature for the reasons mentioned; however, duty cycle should be pretty close to 50% as charge and discharge are through exactly the same timing components.
John
Paisley (and others) apparently agree. I have updated my files. Thanks for pointing that out.This works well with a CMOS 555, because the output swings rail to rail. The bipolar 555's high level is about 1.4 volts shy of the rail, so the duty cycle will be noticeably greater than 50%.
I thought dividing a crystal was supposed to be more accurate than mains?If you are trying for a 1 second pulse, you would be much better off running a divide by 32768 (2^15) IC.
Electronic components tend to be more stable in the kHz to Mhz range. Tolerances of 5% on a nanosecond are a lot tighter than 1% tolerance on a 1mS timer.
For a 1 second pulse, these are the most accurate:
1) Cesium fountain laser frequency source at NIST
2) HP 5060A Cesium Beam Clock Source
3) WWVB 1 second pulse with propagation delay accounted for.
4) 60Hz (US) Line Frequency Source
5) Temperature controlled precision cut quartz crystal (OXCO)
6) Crystal Oscillator divided down
..
..
..
10) R/C Delay Circuit (far less accurate than any methods above)
Depends on which country you are in. In the US, mains are extremely well regulated and adjusted for any prior timing errors. In other countries, a crystal oscillator would be more accurate than the mains frequency.I thought dividing a crystal was supposed to be more accurate than mains?
so if you had a 4017 with an antenna on the input pin you could derive the frequency that way?Depends on which country you are in. In the US, mains are extremely well regulated and adjusted for any prior timing errors. In other countries, a crystal oscillator would be more accurate than the mains frequency.
Yes. Wrap an antenna around the input power, etc. This is the method many alarm clocks use to keep excellent time.so if you had a 4017 with an antenna on the input pin you could derive the frequency that way?
i know theres enough 60Hz going on to trigger it if its on a breadboard.
http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/showthread.php?t=47400
Please post a schematic. If you have what I think you have, decoding from your counter outputs to 7-segment decoder/drivers would be a nightmare of small-scale logic ICs.Thanks for everything..
finally i came up with a oscillator using crystal. its producing 1Hz pulze. I am feeding this to 4017ICs to count seconds, mins and Hours. everything is done. Now I can put some LEDs for Mins and Hours to show the time. But I am thinking of using 7-Segment display. i have some displays.. i want to connect this 7-S display to the 4017 IC. is there any suitable IC that i can use to convert the clock pulzes from 4017 and give OPs to feed 7-Segment display?