Agreed, though keeping in mind the cited case was over 60 years ago, and designs and procedures have since changed (or, at very least, should have) to account for the causes. There are currently 436 active reactors in the world (excluding those on submarines and other craft), so the catastrophic disaster rate is sitting at under 1% (SL-1, 3-Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima being the cases I'm aware of).That reactor needs to be fail-safe and then some.
https://factsheets.inl.gov/FactSheets/Just the Facts_SL-1.pdf
Navy Seabee Richard C. Legg, 26, was impaled against the ceiling by a metal shield plug •
Army Specialist John A. Byrnes, 22, who improperly pulled the control rod, was slammed against a concrete wall, his ribs piercing his heart •
Army Specialist Richard Leroy McKinley, 27, was knocked unconscious and lived two hours, dying from head wounds in an ambulance waiting for a doctor to arrive from Idaho Falls to determine how best to care for him.
I work with lots of former Navy reactor techs that all helped to make that great safety record but I still worry about robust containment on small nuclear modular reactors in the case of the unknown and the unexpected.Agreed, though keeping in mind the cited case was over 60 years ago, and designs and procedures have since changed (or, at very least, should have) to account for the causes. There are currently 436 active reactors in the world (excluding those on submarines and other craft), so the catastrophic disaster rate is sitting at under 1% (SL-1, 3-Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima being the cases I'm aware of).
I report likewiseThe first link is oddly not available in Mexico.
Loving Xcaret!I report likewise
Then there is Windscale, the UK’s worst nuclear accident.There are currently 436 active reactors in the world (excluding those on submarines and other craft), so the catastrophic disaster rate is sitting at under 1% (SL-1, 3-Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima being the cases I'm aware of).
So if I'm reading this right...there were so many design flaws (that were known about, warned about, and largely ignored in the name of finishing on time and under budget) that catastrophe was inevitable. Even Price and Crockfort's filters appear to have been criticized right up until the reactor failed.Then there is Windscale, the UK’s worst nuclear accident.
The accident could have been far worse if Sir John Crockfort, the renowned British physicist, had not insisted on attaching some expensive filtering atop the chimneys.
Search for it. A fascinating story.
