Hello,
My project is somewhat of an "already been done" for the most part. I am building a wireless N64 controller. (That parts been done) From the best of my knowledge I have the TX and RX circuits complete, however, the controller is reliant on a manual on/off switch. I'm wondering the best way to go about adding an inactivity monitor to the mix to allow the controller to turn off after a certain amount of time of no buttons being pressed. Then, perhaps a specific button (or any button) to wake it back up. I'd be perfectly fine with just needing to turn it back on though. I have no issues changing to momentary switch as I see this is the most popular way to do this type of circuit. Also all the controllers today that have this feature are setup without a manual on/off.
I saw a thread on here about an auto off circuit that looked promising, but if I can integrate it directly using the IC I have that would be ideal.
Attached is the TX schematic. Please let me know what you think about this.
Linked HERE is the thread I thought looked promising.
Thanks!
My project is somewhat of an "already been done" for the most part. I am building a wireless N64 controller. (That parts been done) From the best of my knowledge I have the TX and RX circuits complete, however, the controller is reliant on a manual on/off switch. I'm wondering the best way to go about adding an inactivity monitor to the mix to allow the controller to turn off after a certain amount of time of no buttons being pressed. Then, perhaps a specific button (or any button) to wake it back up. I'd be perfectly fine with just needing to turn it back on though. I have no issues changing to momentary switch as I see this is the most popular way to do this type of circuit. Also all the controllers today that have this feature are setup without a manual on/off.
I saw a thread on here about an auto off circuit that looked promising, but if I can integrate it directly using the IC I have that would be ideal.
Attached is the TX schematic. Please let me know what you think about this.
Linked HERE is the thread I thought looked promising.
Thanks!
Attachments
-
36.8 KB Views: 6