looking Long range laser rangefinder sensor.

Thread Starter

strantor

Joined Oct 3, 2010
6,797
I need a long range (500+ yards/meters) laser rangefinder that I can integrate with a project. Preferably UART/SPI/whatever, but if there's only analog I'll take it.

<rant>
I thought this was old & inexpensive technology, piece of (cheap) cake. But I cannot seem to find a sensor to save my life. Mouser only has two avaliable with a range of 200+m. Digikey only has two rated 100+m. Sparkfun is no help. Scrolling through Adafruit's animated list of offerings I have to laugh at all these clips of someone measuring the distance from their hand to breadboard; What the heck do you use that for?! And if you're just measuring 1-2ft why not use much cheaper ultrasonics? Why is there such a flood of these wimpy Lidar sensors and why do the ones with any respectable range cost so much? And if respectable range is so expensive, how does this 800yd handheld rangefinder on Amazon cost only $42? What is it about these finished products (handheld rangefinders for golfing/sporting that have been around for ages) that makes them inexpensive? And how can I achieve the same?
</rant>

Is there any way to hack a cheap handheld and pull data out of it? I'd really rather not, but I will, if it's possible and if there's no alternative. I'd really rather use the cheap (if not millimeter accurate) laser rangefinder sensor that I expect to exist. You know, like the one inside the $42 rangefinder. Where is it? Am I just not using the right keywords? Is there a simple circuit I could build?

EDIT: I guess I should specify the accuracy I'm after. Doesn't have to be that precise. +/- 10% maybe.
 

Thread Starter

strantor

Joined Oct 3, 2010
6,797
I'll admit this looks somewhat dodgy but this.
I did see that one, or one that looked just like it on ebay. The one I saw claimed to have a 1W laser which seemed excessive. The one you linked to claims a 50W laser! Whatever the case I don't see why such a powerful laser is required. The sporting rangefinder runs on a single CR2 battery. And why is it $150 coming from China? That implies a $500 price tag if coming from anywhere else. Still excessive technology and excessive price compared to what I expected to find.

I do appreciate your input and I may yet choose that device, dodgy as it is, because it's the closest thing I've seen to what I'm looking for. I feel like there is something big that I am missing. I just want that golf rangefinder technology but I don't know what to look for. I seriously doubt that the thing in the link is the same technology as what's in a golf rangefinder. I wish I knew what to google.
 

Thread Starter

strantor

Joined Oct 3, 2010
6,797
This might help some.

Yes, I think it did. It helped me to reach the decision to just buy a cheap golf range finder and hack it into submission. It remains a mystery to me why it's so cheap when you buy the consumer product and so damned expensive when you try buy just the relevant bits, but they do seem to be the same technology. I'm sure I can get some kind of data out of it. Hopefully there is a nice clean serial signal on one if the pins inside that spells out the measured range, but if not, there is a ribbon cable going to that transparent LCD in the eyepiece and I feel pretty good about being able to highjack that. When I have succeeded maybe I should order 10k units from China, hack a serial output into them, and sell them at 1,500% markup.
 

MrSalts

Joined Apr 2, 2020
2,767
You can get a Lidar. Some surveying contour mapping lidars can do better than 4" resolution from an airplane at 1000-feet or more (through leaves). Look for Leddar Tech, Ouster, Velodyne, Continental Lidar Systems,

I'd wish you luck but I think you blocked me - so...

https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-lidar-data-and-where-can-i-download-it

the iPhone13 Pro has a Lidar on board just in case you might already own one. It can't do the long range you want but, at least you get an idea of how it works.

how do you expect something that costs $42 to measure a 1500 foot range. I assume you have no idea about multi-watt lasers, the safety, the optics required to focus IR beyond 1100 nm ("eye safe" is beyond 1500nm).

I guess my new signature line will become, "Everything is stupid until you take the effort to learn how challenges are overcome and understand the physics."
 
Last edited:

MrSalts

Joined Apr 2, 2020
2,767
Quiz: if a laser is fired to a target 500m away, and it reflects off of a surface, is the light still coherent? What energy will a 2watt laser light have by the time it makes the full 1km round trip to a 1cm diameter receiving lens?
A) assume a the target is a person wearing a faded denim jacket
B) assume the target is a dog with black hair
C) assume the target is a natural limestone outcropping.

and, how much do you think it should cost?
 
Hi strantor,

I work in a mountain search and rescue team and in order to locate victims or areas we are using a « GPS Binocular » which allows you to point to a place and get its lat/long coordinates + distance with only the click of a button. Problem is that the range of the binoculars is limited (1km maximum) and it is above all super heavy (more than 3 kilograms).
Last week I thought about building my own « GPS Gun » based on Arduino.
What it needs looks (at first) very simple : a laser range finder module ; a gps chip ; an lcd screen, a compass and that’s it !
The principles on which it would work : you aim at the area you want to search ; you push the button and the range finder calculates the range while the compass calculates the azimuth ; the device then uses your gps coordinates to compute the victim’s coordinates by adding the distance and the direction.

But unfortunately it only looks simple… My first problem is finding the right rangefinder laser module for Arduino. Or hacking a cheap long range laser rangefinder, like you’ve tried to do.

Have you had any success in your endeavor ?

huge thanks !
 

Thread Starter

strantor

Joined Oct 3, 2010
6,797
Hi strantor,

I work in a mountain search and rescue team and in order to locate victims or areas we are using a « GPS Binocular » which allows you to point to a place and get its lat/long coordinates + distance with only the click of a button. Problem is that the range of the binoculars is limited (1km maximum) and it is above all super heavy (more than 3 kilograms).
Last week I thought about building my own « GPS Gun » based on Arduino.
What it needs looks (at first) very simple : a laser range finder module ; a gps chip ; an lcd screen, a compass and that’s it !
The principles on which it would work : you aim at the area you want to search ; you push the button and the range finder calculates the range while the compass calculates the azimuth ; the device then uses your gps coordinates to compute the victim’s coordinates by adding the distance and the direction.

But unfortunately it only looks simple… My first problem is finding the right rangefinder laser module for Arduino. Or hacking a cheap long range laser rangefinder, like you’ve tried to do.

Have you had any success in your endeavor ?

huge thanks !
No this project got moved to the back burner but I will be picking it back up in the near future. I will post back here if I find anything, and likewise if you find something please let me know.

For your project, won't you also need to calculate elevation? Like for example you're standing on a mountain peak and you zap a victim down in a valley, your range will be the hypoteneuse of a triangle, when what the rescuer needs is the base of that triangle. Because GPS coordinates using the hypoteneuse value will be off by perhaps an amount that matters.

A more extreme example to illustrate the point. You're standing on a sheer cliff and the victim is at the bottom. The victim is only 2m in front of you, but 100m down. You zap the victim and the GPS coordinates it returns reflect a point that is 100m in front of you.
 

MrSalts

Joined Apr 2, 2020
2,767
A more extreme example to illustrate the point. You're standing on a sheer cliff and the victim is at the bottom. The victim is only 2m in front of you, but 100m down. You zap the victim and the GPS coordinates it returns reflect a point that is 100m in front of you.
the more extreme your example are, the easier it is to explain to the dispatch team. For your last "extreme example", one could simply tell dispatch, "at the bottom of the cliff at my current position" or "100m down the cliff from my current position. I'd bet the chopper crew could find the victim pretty easily. Working to solve all "extreme examples" can cause more confusion than benefit.
 

Thread Starter

strantor

Joined Oct 3, 2010
6,797
the more extreme your example are, the easier it is to explain to the dispatch team. For your last "extreme example", one could simply tell dispatch, "at the bottom of the cliff at my current position". I'd bet the chopper crew could find the victim pretty easily.
Why settle for imperfect data with corrections filtered through the telephone game when the device can get it correct from the start? I only asked because some of these devices for golf and for shooting, have an accelerometer built in and they provide not only range but also the rise and run if there is an elevation change. I was going to recommend starting with one of them.

The extreme example was only for the purpose I stated, illustrating the point. The real problem would be the first example, where there is a long range and an intermediate angle, it may throw off the reading by an appreciable amount and in a way that isn't easy to explain to someone over a radio.
 
Hi and thanks for your answers !
Indeed Strator, you are right, ideally I need to take into account elevation in order to have a more precise location. If it does not cost too much I will definitely do it.
For the moment, I bought this laser rangefinder on Amazon :
https://a.co/d/2bZkGqe

What I will try to do now is to connect it to an Arduino with a gps chip… I’ll keep you posted !
https://a.co/d/2bZkGqe
 
Top