yes that might be correct. I tried various cores. It was hard to find a configuration that allows startup at all.
Efficiency during normal operation is not too bad.
A very small $1 cooler is used, and the MOSFET heat dev. can be controlled well. The core of the inductor does not heat up reasonably.
For the TL494 SMPS, the cores heat up but only very slowly, it will take minutes until they get hot.
So the total loss in the cores is only 1W or something like this.
1. Exposing the cores to airflow
2. Using two cores in parallel
both helped to contain this isssue.
The cores are still not optimal, but there is no urgent need to change the circuit. I was mainly built for research, and I have experimented a lot with these two circuits + learned many things.
Efficiency during normal operation is not too bad.
A very small $1 cooler is used, and the MOSFET heat dev. can be controlled well. The core of the inductor does not heat up reasonably.
For the TL494 SMPS, the cores heat up but only very slowly, it will take minutes until they get hot.
So the total loss in the cores is only 1W or something like this.
1. Exposing the cores to airflow
2. Using two cores in parallel
both helped to contain this isssue.
The cores are still not optimal, but there is no urgent need to change the circuit. I was mainly built for research, and I have experimented a lot with these two circuits + learned many things.