



Imagine a world where no such reliance is necessary.I now rely on an antivirus/antimalware...
You know, it's always possible that Windows has just become so fat and clunky that maintenance is impossible anymore.https://www.windowscentral.com/micr...pdate-kb5078127-released-address-outlook-bugs
Microsoft issues SECOND emergency out of band update for Windows 11 to address disastrous Patch Tuesday bugs — KB5078127 released globally
"30% of our software is written with AI"
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/29/sat...rcent-of-microsoft-code-is-written-by-ai.html
and it shows.
I heard that only 1% to 5%, (perhaps less than 1%) of Windows 11 users were negatively impacted by KB5074109https://www.windowscentral.com/micr...pdate-kb5078127-released-address-outlook-bugs
Microsoft issues SECOND emergency out of band update for Windows 11 to address disastrous Patch Tuesday bugs — KB5078127 released globally
"30% of our software is written with AI"
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/29/sat...rcent-of-microsoft-code-is-written-by-ai.html
and it shows.

Windows didn't "fail" it caused problems for a few users, just like this hardware fault did:Software guys!
If 1% of shipped semiconductor products failed in the field installed in consumer products after something like a die shrink, that company would in deep dodo.
Intel wisely went nuclear on the solution. "1 in 9 billion" vs 1%My first PC a Pentium had that flaw, I still have the original processer in my collection.
The reason I still have the processor is not because of the recall, but an upgrade I made.
It was a process bug, not a design bug.When the Pentium's original array was compiled into the mask pattern used for fabrication, five values of +2 were not received by the lithography equipment. As a result, five array cells in the actual chips' etched PLAs that were supposed to contain +2 actually contained zero.
The severity of the FDIV bug is debated. Though rarely encountered by most users (Byte magazine estimated that 1 in 9 billion floating point divides with random parameters would produce inaccurate results),[3] both the flaw and Intel's initial handling of the matter were heavily criticized by the tech community.
...
In December 1994, Intel recalled the defective processors in what was the first full recall of a computer chip.[4] In its 1994 annual report, Intel said it incurred "a $475 million pretax charge ... to cover replacement and write-off of these microprocessors."[5]
Might even be a collectible...My first PC a Pentium had that flaw, I still have the original processer in my collection.
The reason I still have the processor is not because of the recall, but an upgrade I made.
It means we're back to the time-sharing systems of the 60s and 70s.What does this mean for user control?
Here's a preview of the next version of Windows:What's old is new again.
It's been 'when' for me three times now, and I'm back with Windows again. I want to make the move, and it's great until something doesn't work and I run smack into the cliff of the learning curve. I think Windows is ahead on user interface at the technical level, sadly.The day of reckoning is getting closer. For me, it's not a matter of if, but rather of when I'm going to leave Windows behind