Is there a difference between using an inductor of close generic value or natural frequency?

Thread Starter

phyzxengr

Joined Feb 23, 2023
5
I have a radio engineering question: What works better in a tank circuit, a coil at its natural frequency that matches the incoming frequency or a coil within range of the incoming frequency?
 

Papabravo

Joined Feb 24, 2006
22,065
Can you define what you mean by "works better"? The reason I ask is that the resonant frequency of a tank circuit depends on the capacitance of the capacitor in parallel as well as the parasitics. The Q of the tank circuit will depend on the series and parallel resistances. As you may begin to appreciate "works better" is not exactly a measurable quantity by any means.
 

Papabravo

Joined Feb 24, 2006
22,065
For 'Works better' I mean is there a Q difference?
For that you basically have to look at the magnitudes of the real and imaginary parts of the impedance. The real part is governed by the DC resistance of the wire and the ESR of the capacitor in parallel.
 

MisterBill2

Joined Jan 23, 2018
27,314
By your reference to "tank circuit" I am guessing that the coil is to be part of a transmitter circuit. The resistance of the coil as well as of the connections, has a big effect on the effective "Q" of a coil in a tuned circuit, especially at resonance. In transmitters and other power circuits with a resonant circuit, a very high "Q" factor will tend toward high currents flowing tn the tuned circuit. THAT can cause problems. The theoretical "Natural resonance" of a coil is from the assorted capacitance between the turns. Normally that is not an issue.

So what are you building?? It sounds interesting.
 

Thread Starter

phyzxengr

Joined Feb 23, 2023
5
By your reference to "tank circuit" I am guessing that the coil is to be part of a transmitter circuit. The resistance of the coil as well as of the connections, has a big effect on the effective "Q" of a coil in a tuned circuit, especially at resonance. In transmitters and other power circuits with a resonant circuit, a very high "Q" factor will tend toward high currents flowing tn the tuned circuit. THAT can cause problems. The theoretical "Natural resonance" of a coil is from the assorted capacitance between the turns. Normally that is not an issue.

So what are you building?? It sounds interesting.
1739642389059.png
I am trying to see what range I can put this transmitter into other than its nature one.
 

MisterBill2

Joined Jan 23, 2018
27,314
Transmitting on those frequencies for any distance requires a lot of power. They were used by the NAVY at one time to communicate with submarines underwater.
In general, resonant circuits tend to greater efficiency when the inductive and capacitive reactances are similar.
NO, I do not have the math to back that claim, it is what I heard from those more familiar with designing resonant circuits than I am.
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
16,271
Transmitting on those frequencies for any distance requires a lot of power. They were used by the NAVY at one time to communicate with submarines underwater.
In general, resonant circuits tend to greater efficiency when the inductive and capacitive reactances are similar.
NO, I do not have the math to back that claim, it is what I heard from those more familiar with designing resonant circuits than I am.
1739655819754.png
1739655915488.png
https://klubnl.pl/wpr/en/index.php/2022/06/16/analysis-of-zevs-messages/
Russia still uses ELF (82 hertz) for sub communications.

Some have used this for traffic analysis to see if 'events' are planned. The messages are encrypted so you look for unique message signatures of time, periods and other factors instead of content.
https://klubnl.pl/wpr/en/index.php/2022/06/17/zevs-messages-during-the-russian-invasion-in-ukraine/
It’s interesting that the peak of activity is a few weeks before the russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022-02-22:
Today, VLF is the used in the USA sub and sometimes in surface fleet for EAM communications.
 
Last edited:
Top