No, I would have bought a newer generation if the price was right then. I'm still very satisfied with the current system and can easily swap upgrade by moving my PCIE boards to a newer system if I see a very good deal. Just be careful about the shipping costs, I got free shipping on my system.nsa, are you focusing on 5th generation of these?
After you posted I started looking at these since the price is pretty good and I am looking at the 7th generation with 6 core cpu, they are still at 120-200 range.
I know what you mean about shipping. The cheapest G7 with 12 cores (2 six core cpu) that I saw on ebay was 126, but cpu are in 2 to 2.4 GHz range and about 12 GB of ram. Once you start picking faster cpu, closer to 3 GHz, the price goes up to 160 or 180. That is why I have not bought one, yet.No, I would have bought a newer generation if the price was right then. I'm still very satisfied with the current system and can easily swap upgrade by moving my PCIE boards to a newer system if I see a very good deal. Just be careful about the shipping costs, I got free shipping on my system.
I might as well ask you.The prices are still good. You will need a few additions to make it a useful PC desktop by upgrading the video and adding sound. I used a Nvidia geforce-gt-710 because it don't need the external GPU power cables you won't find in a server. (I think the fan version of the gt-730 should be OK too)
Sure. This class of computer has the reliability and power to run compute-bound programs with large datasets at full speed just about forever without overheating or crashing because of a hardware fault. What they don't have is the capability to be a great gaming machine because the graphics capabilities are limited and they are usually noisy from the cooling fans.would one of these be good for rendering 3D stills and animation?
Thanks. Would the graphics limitations prevent me using 3 or 4 monitors with it?Sure. This class of computer has the reliability and power to run compute-bound programs with large datasets at full speed just about forever without overheating or crashing because of a hardware fault. What they don't have is the capability to be a great gaming machine because the graphics capabilities are limited and they are usually noisy from the cooling fans.
I can run dual monitors with the GT-710. A GT-740 or better should run 3.Thanks. Would the graphics limitations prevent me using 3 or 4 monitors with it?
No, you're not hijacking. These are very valid question on why use a old rack server instead of a brand new I5 from Best Buy. The reason I don't just buy a Best Buy machine is the same reason the data centers don't just buy the fastest Best Buy machines. The reason is reliability and redundancy when your data/code is your gold. What you get is top of the line hardware that's actually been spec'd for 24/7 usage. This machine is a replacement for a quad processor Dell desktop that was in my home shop mainly for programming duties. I don't think 3D rendering would be a good application for this type of machine if the software depends on GPU power. The desktop/gaming market is clearly geared to the monster video card power needed for good 3D rendering.Some of the older Refurb quadcore+ desktop computers I have been looking at, while reading the comments, I became a little lost. Like this computer for example, the specs (from my elementary understanding) seem impressive, with ~3GHz, 8 cores, 48 GB ram, 1TB SSD, etc. but lots of people were ripping it to pieces in the comments section (mostly because of the unreasonable price I imagine).
What I distilled from the comments (plus further reading) was that there are basically 2 sets of specs; the ones always listed in bold font - the ones I'm used to paying attention to (# cores, processor speed, GB of ram, etc), and another that most people don't know about (Ram DDR#, SATA rev#, processor socket lithography, firmware #s, etc) and in a computer that old (only 8y/o?), the bold font specs don't even matter; the second set of specs is so bad that it renders the first set irrelevant. Some were saying that that old 3GHz 8-core processor would be slower than a late model Intel i5.
I don't know these people and I don't know their agenda. What they are saying sounds plausible, but really? I can go buy a brand new I5 computer from Best Buy and it will be faster than this 3Ghz 8-core monster?
I bring this up not to diminish the impressive-sounding specs of your DL380, but to try and get a true understanding of exactly how impressive they are. I know the machine is old. I know it's cheap. I can find newer ones on eBay for <$200 that are very tempting. But If I'm going to get a computer for doing 3D rendering, would I be better off getting one of these and upgrading the GPU (et. al.) or getting a brand-new sub-$1k "gaming" desktop from Best buy, whose bold font specs are lower than the DL380's?
I feel like I'm borderline hijacking here. Or maybe more than borderline. If you'd like, I can start my own noob questions thread.
I am not really sure what I'm talking about but my understanding is that for 3D modelling, GPU is less important than a fast processor and ram. When I look at computers designed for 3D modelling, they don't have the high performance gaming GPU (it's decent but not crazy) and they cost a lot more than gaming laptops.I don't think 3D rendering would be a good application for this type of machine if the software depends on GPU power. The desktop/gaming market is clearly geared to the monster video card power needed for good 3D rendering.
Basically that amazon listing is old work station with some add ons and like people in comments said, it is a total rip off for 1700 USD.Some of the older Refurb quadcore+ desktop computers I have been looking at, while reading the comments, I became a little lost. Like this computer for example, the specs (from my elementary understanding) seem impressive, with ~3GHz, 8 cores, 48 GB ram, 1TB SSD, etc. but lots of people were ripping it to pieces in the comments section (mostly because of the unreasonable price I imagine).
What I distilled from the comments (plus further reading) was that there are basically 2 sets of specs; the ones always listed in bold font - the ones I'm used to paying attention to (# cores, processor speed, GB of ram, etc), and another that most people don't know about (Ram DDR#, SATA rev#, processor socket lithography, firmware #s, etc) and in a computer that old (only 8y/o?), the bold font specs don't even matter; the second set of specs is so bad that it renders the first set irrelevant. Some were saying that that old 3GHz 8-core processor would be slower than a late model Intel i5.
I don't know these people and I don't know their agenda. What they are saying sounds plausible, but really? I can go buy a brand new I5 computer from Best Buy and it will be faster than this 3Ghz 8-core monster?
I bring this up not to diminish the impressive-sounding specs of your DL380, but to try and get a true understanding of exactly how impressive they are. I know the machine is old. I know it's cheap. I can find newer ones on eBay for <$200 that are very tempting. But If I'm going to get a computer for doing 3D rendering, would I be better off getting one of these and upgrading the GPU (et. al.) or getting a brand-new sub-$1k "gaming" desktop from Best buy, whose bold font specs are lower than the DL380's?
I feel like I'm borderline hijacking here. Or maybe more than borderline. If you'd like, I can start my own noob questions thread.
I don't think they make single slot GTX 750 or 950.GPU power even on a older cp is what you need for 3D
these severs are fun I have 2 my problem has been video I can't find a card that fit's it's only 2 inch high
The built in card is old school. But it supper for what it's doing web server to test code on.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
K | Linux Source Code Folder Structure | Programming & Languages | 9 | |
Embedded programming on Linux | Microcontrollers | 4 | ||
D | TCL / Linux question | Software & IDEs | 3 | |
Linux at Home | Off-Topic | 40 | ||
Any Linux experts out there? | Software & IDEs | 8 |