Hi Watt, British Army, Electronics wiring by hand without pcb

Thread Starter

Mustafa Umut Sarac

Joined Jun 19, 2010
8
I read that British army and the hiwatt guys are making the electronics without pcb but hand wiring the components to each other. I have questions:

- What is the name of that technology , closest I found point to point wiring and I found something like manhattan. I need to learn the correct term to discuss at forums. I think that technology been used to shorten the repair time in faraway country.

- Do they use solder ?

- Do they use knot ?

- If they dont use solder , do they calculate the increase of resistance with each two metal wires knot or dont they calculate that ?

- Is there a correct way to make that knots ?

Thanks,

Mustafa Umut Sarac
Istanbul
 

Janis59

Joined Aug 21, 2017
1,893
I dont know about British militarists, yet the every day I see that PCB is most un-appropriate material for high power high-frequency that is obvious, just by one figure from FR-4 material datasheet - tan(fi)=0,015.
Yes, You may dispute that Rogers inc materials has better, up to 0,0015 tangens, but it is not cheap material and anyway free-air wiring has much better factor.
 

SLK001

Joined Nov 29, 2011
1,549
I dont know about British militarists, yet the every day I see that PCB is most un-appropriate material for high power high-frequency that is obvious, just by one figure from FR-4 material datasheet - tan(fi)=0,015.
Yes, You may dispute that Rogers inc materials has better, up to 0,0015 tangens, but it is not cheap material and anyway free-air wiring has much better factor.
Who uses FR-4 for high frequency circuits? ANSWER: NO ONE! Anyone who designs for high frequency knows that he is going to have to use a board material with better specs than FR-4. It could be alumina, saffire, GaAs, teflon, duroid or even one of Rogers offerings. No one uses free-air wiring for production designs. It is neither consistant nor controlable - and leaded components add in their own problems.
 

Thread Starter

Mustafa Umut Sarac

Joined Jun 19, 2010
8
Wirewrap and death bug seems promising. Breadboarding is also. And others.

I think I want to build a amp , without board or solder. Everything will be in fly and everything would be wirewrapped. My concern is the resistance of wirewrapped joint. I am not electronic guy and I want to get opinion to my question
 

shortbus

Joined Sep 30, 2009
10,049
When done correctly,with the right tool and using wire wrap pins it is actually a lower resistance joint than soldered. But you need to use real wire wrap pins and sockets, wire wrap on standard component leads need solder. The correct pins are of a square cross section and the wire 'bites' into the edge of the pin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_wrap
 

SLK001

Joined Nov 29, 2011
1,549
When done correctly,with the right tool and using wire wrap pins it is actually a lower resistance joint than soldered. But you need to use real wire wrap pins and sockets, wire wrap on standard component leads need solder. The correct pins are of a square cross section and the wire 'bites' into the edge of the pin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_wrap
It's actually even a more reliable connection than soldering. However, it CANNOT be used for RF circuits (if you want them to work).
 
Top