Also, some of their CEO's sold off big blocks of their personal stock after they found out about the leak but before the news was released to the public.If yo go to their sit to find ouf the compromised your data they they to get you toaccept binding arbitration. Real winners they are
You seem to believe that pro-small government == anti-justice. Your assumption is incorrect. But we cannot debate that here.I know more government regulations are anathema to our conservative friends, but it does seem like there needs to be a more serious penalty for companies not protecting our personal data.
Right now they have no particular reason to be concerned about that (other than some bad press that lasts for a few weeks).
I see no particular relation between the two.You seem to believe that pro-small government == anti-justice.
I know.I see no particular relation between the two.
Then why did you say I did?I know.
I was agreeing that you don't see a relation. One exists, but likely not in the way you would assume. Whether conscious of it or not.Then why did you say I did?
FWIW, they've had to backtrack on two issues:If yo go to their sit to find ouf the compromised your data they they to get you toaccept binding arbitration. Real winners they are
You can freeze/ unfreeze your credit reporting at the following links:FWIW, they've had to backtrack on two issues:
1) Signing up for their identity protection does not forfeit your rights in future class actions and
2) You will not be automatically enrolled and charged for the service when the free year expires.
Maybe I'm a chump but I went ahead and signed up for the free monitoring. The confirmation process failed, though, because their servers are overloaded.
Conservative thought is not anti-regulation. Quite the opposite, actually. The law is incredibly important to protecting freedom and ensuring a free and functioning economy. It's the rules aimed at other goals such social engineering or other projects, often created and enforced without constitutional authority (I'm looking at you, EPA) that are abhorrent.I know more government regulations are anathema to our conservative friends, but it does seem like there needs to be a more serious penalty for companies not protecting our personal data.
That's a double edged sword. It costs money to freeze and freezing also prevents you from opening new lines of credit.You can freeze/ unfreeze your credit reporting at the following links:
I agree re penalties for their negligence, including their full responsibility for making harmed individuals whole.A better solution is for entities that expose your data to be held accountable for credit monitoring and repair for the lifetime of the affected individual; and to pay punitive penalties to the individual and the government (to pay for more oversight). To avoid liability, they need to show their breach couldn't have cause the problem.
Hi,If yo go to their sit to find ouf the compromised your data they they to get you toaccept binding arbitration. Real winners they are
As of 9/8, there is no waiver of rights:Didnt they rescind that now?

I think "honest corporations" is close to an oxymoron, but that's another story.Onerous regulations upon honest corporations