The circuit should also be changed with it.

The circuit is not changed! -- Hence the adjective equivalent!!!

 

not getting sorry.
from where we get then the extra value?

 

here

 

here

The circled figures indicate the reactance of the network reactors (post compensation)

If you wish to see the values sans (need for) compensation have a gander at this schematic:

 

OK, for maximum power the Resistance and reactance both should be same??
And the solution is going over my head i can't catch it sorry.

 

OK, for maximum power the Resistance and reactance both should be same??
And the solution is going over my head i can't catch it sorry.

The matching network causes each port to 'see' it's conjugate, as it were ---In that regard it's analogous to a [language] interpreter...

 

I am not getting the working from where these value of RL coming?

 

I am not getting the working from where these value of RL coming?

Please show me where?

 

from starting itself

 

Where are you seeing 'RL'???

 

the question start from port 1 and 2 ...

 

the question start from port 1 and 2 ...

What is the post number?

 

need solution in step

 

need solution in step

I don't see 'RL' -- I want to help you, but you need to tell me where you are seeing "RL"....

 

PORT1 contain series RC
PORT2 contain // RL

now the game begin how to start from here.

 

PORT1 contain series RC
PORT2 contain // RL

now the game begin how to start from here.

Correct... Now what's your question?

 

If you wish to 'take it by steps' you may start by solving for the network reactors as if the ports were non-reactive (as shown in post #204)

 

how to begin...
method.

 

how to begin...
method.

Retrace the solution of the example shown in post #204 via thoughtful attention to the implications of post #145 and the power-hint in post #117

 

pls tell in step not getting getting total mixture in mind.