Only time will tell, whether Microsoft’s move was a milestone forward or a significant mistake. Right now, my brainpower is way too small to determine one way or another.

But as others have already stated, the only actual truth is that change is constant and inevitable. Otherwise we would still be using candles for illumination.

It's part of cost reduction, all these decisions are ultimately financially motivated.

 

It's part of cost reduction, all these decisions are ultimately financially motivated.

Is their any other reason to invest in a publicly held company?

Do you invest so as to not maximize financial gain?

 

Is their any other reason to invest in a publicly held company?

Do you invest so as to not maximize financial gain?

Are you disputing what I said "It's part of cost reduction, all these decisions are ultimately financially motivated" ?

 

Are you disputing what I said "It's part of cost reduction, all these decisions are ultimately financially motivated" ?

No. But I detected a bit of derision directed at the term "financially motivated". As I am not a mind reader, it is possible I misunderstood your motivation to state the obvious.

 

No. But I detected a bit of derision directed at the term "financially motivated". As I am not a mind reader, it is possible I misunderstood your motivation to state the obvious.

My post was a response to this:

Only time will tell, whether Microsoft’s move was a milestone forward or a significant mistake.