Maybe it's really a diode tester or a hand warmer...Not sure if that would be considered protection.![]()
Maybe it's really a diode tester or a hand warmer...Not sure if that would be considered protection.![]()
Unfortunately, the web is filled to the brims with such sites.The next time you see such a poorly drawn schematic, make a note of the source, ignore it, and never use information from that source again.
I apply the same methodology for everything on the WEB.Unfortunately, the web is filled to the brims with such sites.
The problem is not constrained to electronics. It affects every area of human-interest spectrum.
Sorry I didnt save the web, just took note of the circuit as many other things I note, next time I will be more careful about the sourceWhere did you find that nonsense?
If we assume that the inductors are being used as chokes, you wouldn't need the one on the negative battery terminal. You also wouldn't need the one on the positive terminal. If there was any noise, preventing it from affecting the power source would be the least of your concerns.
If we assume that the parallel capacitors were for decoupling, they would offer better suppression if they were placed near components that were either generating noise, or could be affected by it.
The next time you see such a poorly drawn schematic, make a note of the source, ignore it, and never use information from that source again.
Browser history??Sorry I didnt save the web
It's common courtesy to give attribution for intellectual property that isn't your own.just took note of the circuit as many other things I note, next time I will be more careful about the source