Who said they were?Why are they keeping the weapon secret?
See post #99.Really, what weapon was used?
Google is your friend - https://www.google.com/search?q=saiga+sk+74&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8So, you think that was the weapon? Why won't DPD confirm?
I say they are. The picture of Saiga rifle you posted was leaked by an anonymous source and was linked to in this thread four days ago. (See post 10.) The only information from any official source was that the rifle used was an SKS-45, and to this point that announcement from the Dallas county director of homeland security has never been publicly denied or endorsed by anyone. ETA: By "anyone," I mean any official in the investigation.Who said they were?
At this point, I don't know what it was. I don't know why it would have initially been identified as an SKS-45 if it was a Saiga AK74; they look nothing alike and have nothing in common other than a Russian heritage. The lack of official information does no good for anyone.Apparently not, your google results are different than mine.
Thanks, I kept hearing it was a sks. So it was a small bore. I never owned a "AR" or "AK" style weapon, but I love my sks.
I was looking forward to a surplus Garand from S.K., but obama put the kibosh on that years ago.
I say they are. The picture of Saiga rifle you posted was leaked by an anonymous source and was linked to in this thread four days ago. (See post 10.) The only information from any official source was that the rifle used was an SKS-45, and to this point that announcement from the Dallas county director of homeland security has never been publicly denied or endorsed by anyone. ETA: By "anyone," I mean any official in the investigation.
http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/dallas-cop-killers-rifle.125642/#post-1018322Really, what weapon was used?
Yes your correct. I was wrong, wrong, wrong.Call your congressman with your suggestions. They would love to hear from you.
I said EIC and SSI were federal money. You identified EIC as the recipents money being paid back. I cited a case where your thinking was incorrect.
There are those that game the system well to maximize their EIC. I've had people that walked because they told me a disqualifying item and they didn't like the fact that I told them they didn't qualify for it. So they left and went to another tax preparer and never mentioned the disqualifying statement.
In your state there were 567k claims and 1.5 billion paid out. You can figure out about how many fraudulent cases there were and how much money it "cost". Visit the IRS site.
For the 2014 tax year, 27.5 million received about $66.7 billion in EITC during 2015
Well other than IEC is a credit against your own money, maybe no difference. What right might we take away with it? Keep in mind we are talking about an EO so there should be existing law on the subject.
The highest I could get my little calculator was $6250.The lines already exist. After you figure the tax you owe, then some non refundable tax credits reduce your taxes owed, but can not go below zero.
Then you figure out the amount you payed plus the refundable tax credits. that total minus any tax owed, is your return. I've seen many with no taxes owed and little tax paid in, boost their refund to thousands of dollars.... slot in the 5k to 9k range.
Break out the necessary forms and see for yourself. I would not want to deprive you from learning.
Lets see here, you guys don't like him for not enforcing existing laws, and you don't like him for enforcing existing laws. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/g...rearms-ammunition-and-implements-war/downloadI was looking forward to a surplus Garand from S.K., but obama put the kibosh on that years ago.
The 1968 gun control act was passed when Barack Obama was only about 7 years old. He had nothing to do with it.Lets see here, you guys don't like him for not enforcing existing laws, and you don't like him for enforcing existing laws. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/g...rearms-ammunition-and-implements-war/download
He put the kibosh on it in the 1968 gun control act, he is good.
I do believe they were a "gift" to the Koreans.The 1968 gun control act was passed when Barack Obama was only about 7 years old. He had nothing to do with it.
What he did do was issue an executive order in 2013 prohibiting the return of about 80,000 M1 Garand rifles that were manufactured in the US and sent to Korea for use during that conflict in the 1950's. He issued that executive order to countermand a longstanding policy as described in the document you linked to in your post. Here is the pertinent quote from that document.
Title18 U.S.C. § 925(a)(1) provides that the prohibition on the importation of firearms, firearm frames or receivers, firearm barrels and ammunition does not apply to the importation of firearms or ammunition sold or shipped to, or issued for the use of the United States or any department or agency thereof, or any State or any department, agency, or political subdivision thereof.
Thus, President Obama actually nullified an existing law by using an executive order. It will be within the power of the next POTUS to rescind that executive order.