China’s DeepSeek AI is hitting Nvidia where it hurts

https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/27/24352801/deepseek-ai-chatbot-chatgpt-ios-app-store

 

China’s DeepSeek AI is hitting Nvidia where it hurts

https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/27/24352801/deepseek-ai-chatbot-chatgpt-ios-app-store

I'm not convinced that claims about the economy of DeepSeek are true.

 

What is true is that Nvidia's just lost more than half a trillion of its market value ...

 

What is true is that Nvidia's just lost more than half a trillion of its market value ...

Magic money does disappear. Semiconductors have always been a rollercoaster.

 

Have been playing with DeepAI. Gave it the prompt "Trump as ballet dancer" and it came up with this :



Does the AI have a problem with gender ?

 

that's disturbing ...

 

I see it followed the media's lead and reddened his face.

 

DeepsSeek has also an image tool called janus:

https://github.com/deepseek-ai/Janus/blob/main/janus_pro_tech_report.pdf

 

Have been playing with DeepAI. Gave it the prompt "Trump as ballet dancer" and it came up with this :

View attachment 341469

Does the AI have a problem with gender ?

Best ballet dancer, ever. Never been anything like him. All the ballet dancers before him were terrible, just horrible ballet dancers.

 

I see it followed the media's lead and reddened his face.

Yes, ChatGPT (text, image, etc) is just a vegematic of previous human intelligence.

 

Given that AI seems to output some statistically weighted combination of its model data, can it ever give a 100% accurate response to an input query, or will the response always be 'more or less' accurate?

 

Given that AI seems to output some statistically weighted combination of its model data, can it ever give a 100% accurate response to an input query, or will the response always be 'more or less' accurate?

The answer would appear to be Yes. Using Microsoft Copilot. I actually didn't know what to expect:



On the other hand:

 

This has got to be the funniest game of chess I've ever witnessed. I lolled through almost the whole thing.

 

 

I wish DJT would have named it Skynet, instead of Stargate.

 

If she could get past her cognitive dissonance, she'd be a really smart person.

 

This has got to be the funniest game of chess I've ever witnessed. I lolled through almost the whole thing.

Not a Chess player (grew up playing dominoes with the old guys) so it wasn't funny or informative to those like me that see AI as BS.

 

so it wasn't funny ... to those like me that see AI as BS.

But it was BS. And excellent BS at that! That's why it was funny.

Best quote in the comments:

"So this what happens if a movable object meets a stoppable force..."

 

But it was BS. And excellent BS at that! That's why it was funny.

Best quote in the comments:

"So this what happens if a movable object meets a stoppable force..."

Not being a chess player, I'll take your word for it.

That's one of the AI BS factors that makes me default to BS on everything AI today. Things that look impressive to non-experts are easily seen as good looking but crazy, misleading and often 'funny' BS to experts.

 

Not being a chess player, I'll take your word for it.

That's one of the AI BS factors that makes me default to BS on everything AI today. Things that look impressive to non-experts are easily seen as good looking but crazy, misleading and often 'funny' BS to experts.

Well, if nothing else, AI has a promising future generating cerebral humor.