I have suspicions that this abrupt change in things will be deemed a 'weather anomaly' not climate change being every time something that goes against the AGW/CC crowds views happens it will not be acknowledged or give credit for what its worth. Only proof of perceived negative change is valid.Centuries, months, what difference does it make?
Any weather event that is seen as negative is deemed proof of AGW/CC no matter if it only lasts a day or a week or a month. However any positive changes anywhere has to play out in unfaltering perfection for at least 30 - 50 years to be acknowledged as possible positive climate change for a location.
The multi year california drought will still be proof of AGW/CC just as if they now go into a multi year rain cycle where too much water becomes the problem to deal with where it will be then also be shown to be equal proof even if they both totally contradict everything they define AGW/CC by from one extreme to another.