I'm confused ....
Repairing some Display/Pushbutton boards for Acme iRock 5S and 5B disco lights, there are two driver chips on the board, type 74HC573, designated U1 and U2.
After removing U2, I have discovered that U2 silk-screen says 74HC574, but a 573 was there in its place. U1 silkscreen is 573.
I've looked at the datasheets for both chips, and can see that the 573 has a "Latch Enable" pin, and the 574 has a "Clock" pin.
573 : "When the LATCH ENABLE (LE) pin is HIGH, the Q outputs follow the D inputs. When LE goes LOW, data at the D inputs will be retained at the outputs"
574 : "Data at the D inputs ... are transferred to the Q outputs on positive going transitions of the CLOCK (CK) input."
Output Control is tied to GND on both U1 and U2.
The "Truth Tables" for both types are Identical.
I'm thinking that if both chips are driven by a simple high-going pulse on the LE/CK pins, there is no difference in the way both types of chip will retain the D inputs onto the Q outputs. Would welcome any comments you might have on this.
Repairing some Display/Pushbutton boards for Acme iRock 5S and 5B disco lights, there are two driver chips on the board, type 74HC573, designated U1 and U2.
After removing U2, I have discovered that U2 silk-screen says 74HC574, but a 573 was there in its place. U1 silkscreen is 573.
I've looked at the datasheets for both chips, and can see that the 573 has a "Latch Enable" pin, and the 574 has a "Clock" pin.
573 : "When the LATCH ENABLE (LE) pin is HIGH, the Q outputs follow the D inputs. When LE goes LOW, data at the D inputs will be retained at the outputs"
574 : "Data at the D inputs ... are transferred to the Q outputs on positive going transitions of the CLOCK (CK) input."
Output Control is tied to GND on both U1 and U2.
The "Truth Tables" for both types are Identical.
I'm thinking that if both chips are driven by a simple high-going pulse on the LE/CK pins, there is no difference in the way both types of chip will retain the D inputs onto the Q outputs. Would welcome any comments you might have on this.