I said "Beef", not "beef".Really? ... so you naively believe there's actual beef in a Big Mac?![]()
I said "Beef", not "beef".Really? ... so you naively believe there's actual beef in a Big Mac?![]()
Obviously a joke.Really? ... so you naively believe there's actual beef in a Big Mac?![]()
Journalistic conclusion: Early humans were monopeds.They discovered several more steps preserved in the sediment. The prints were of different sizes and pointed in different directions. Most were right feet.
Tap dancers?https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/28/science/footprints-oldest-north-america.html
Quote from the article:
Journalistic conclusion: Early humans were monopeds.
OMG, another piece to the puzzle. I've been comparing Mormonism to Catholicism for years, finally real similarities to the afterlife or non-existence thereof.There is no Hell.
Since I already believe death results in non-existence, there's no longer any upside to being good.
Thanks, Mr. Francis. I feel much better now.
Ah... how the news just loves to misquote so they can sell their crap... no matter how short-lived:There is no Hell.
Since I already believe death results in non-existence, there's no longer any upside to being good.
Thanks, Mr. Francis. I feel much better now.
http://m.jpost.com/Christian-News/Vatican-rebukes-journalist-who-quoted-pope-as-denying-hell-547458It was at least the third time the Vatican has issued statements distancing itself from Scalfari's articles about the pope, including one in 2014 in which the journalist said the pontiff had abolished sin.
"The fruit of his reconstruction."Ah... how the new just loves to misquote so they can sell their crap...
Ah... how the news just loves to misquote so they can sell their crap... no matter how short-lived:
I like this one personally, "Loves to Misquoute" when I read it last night with 4 shots in me, it was " loves to Mosquito, so they can sell there crap"
http://m.jpost.com/Christian-News/Vatican-rebukes-journalist-who-quoted-pope-as-denying-hell-547458
I don't get this one? Please explain to the below normal intellects or average individuals."The fruit of his reconstruction."
Can I use that?
Which one?I don't get this one?
"The fruit of his reconstruction." I didn't read the article and pull this out correctly? If it even applied or not?Which one?
I had no point except that I like the turn of phrase. It is a very polite, positive, and generous euphemism of "He is a lying bastard destined for Hell." And said without dripping sarcasm, the intended recipient may walk away without even knowing he was chastised. Neat."The fruit of his reconstruction." I didn't read the article and pull this out correctly? If it even applied or not?
kv
We all can, my friend...It seems I can learn something from this Pope
Please restore my post. I was not starting a religious discussion. I was discussing an interesting (and entertaining) use of the English language.MOD:
Please do not start a discussion regarding Religion.
There is a few that does not sit well with me.We all can, my friend...
It's because you posted it, content orientation of a critical opening of "Religious" worms. Who ever complained clearly isn't your biggest fan. Just that they edited should tell you , your a little edgy which bothers them that your that intelligent.Please restore my post. I was not starting a religious discussion. I was discussing an interesting (and entertaining) use of the English language.
Don't be so freakin' touchy.
Edit: and BTW, the fragment of text you left behind (as quoted by @cmartinez) completely changes the context of my thoughts, as evidenced by @MaxHeadRoom's post below.
kvIt looks like a mesh. The interstitium is a layer of fluid-filled compartments strung together in a web of collagen and a flexible protein called elastin. Previously, scientists thought the layer was simply dense connective tissue.
Moderator's note:Panty stealing judge.
"From what I heard, it's a little perverted maybe," neighbor William Bloom said.
You think?