Only in America!
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/is-it-ok-...to-an-airport--this-guy-did-it-173401866.html
Max.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/is-it-ok-...to-an-airport--this-guy-did-it-173401866.html
Max.
Yep. And despite it being legal, how many more bloodbaths have occurred at airports where it's legal than where it isn't.
What absolute baloney that he has a 'right' to carry. Not every swinging di#k has the "right" to carry. There is no guarantee of that.
Not quite: Rights can only be sacrificed to law, not given by it. As stated in our Constitution, we have the right to everything not specifically ceded by law to government in the Constitution.Laws can be changed. Rights cannot be.
I read your post and took it as it states so unless you mistyped your wording giving your post a unintended meaning different than you think it should have had I have no reasons to try and read between the lines for any other meanings or content.You might want to my posts before quoting and responding. Laws can be changed. Rights cannot be.
Opinion not a law based fact.What absolute baloney that he has a 'right' to carry.
Again your opinion not a factual law.Not every swinging di#k has the "right" to carry.
Uninformed opinion being that in fact if the firearm carrying person is in accordance to the federal, state and local laws he/she is in fact guaranteed that they are not breaking any laws nor are legally required to obey or submit personal opinion of others who are not familiar with or in favor ofthe laws as the stand at the point of incidence or action if they chose not to.There is no guarantee of that.
I'll concede you inability to comprehend simple statements of facts.If anyone else cares to jump in here and clarify where I was in error on how I took your post they are fee to do so. Otherwise I will have to concede that your inability to properly convey your intent through text is not my or anyone else's problem.
Where is that stated?Not quite: Rights can only be sacrificed to law, not given by it. As stated in our Constitution, we have the right to everything not specifically ceded by law to government in the Constitution.
Nothing needs to be changed in the Constitution. The 2nd amendment isn't a "free for all" for open carry. If that is the case, then why are only two states mentioned for open carry in airports? If everyone has such a right, why isn't it allowed in all 50 states?The Constitution can be changed if you don't like it. If you think you can convince enough fellow Americans to cede their right to bear arms and abandon the 2nd amendment, go for it. Good luck with that.
Well as a largely fact based forum feel free to educate me and everyone else on the facts of how your statements are factual. I'm sure many here are now wanting to know.I'll concede you inability to comprehend simple statements of facts.
Really? The levels of state and local law/ordinances underlying the federal level laws are unfamiliar to you?If everyone has such a right, why isn't it allowed in all 50 states?
I don't think much; no premeditation just responding to threats as needed and have been trained to do. Your body reacts to threats at that point; it's all muscle memory.Excerpt from Art of War
- 卑则骄之
- Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance.
Well as a largely fact based forum feel free to educate me and everyone else on the facts of how your statements are factual. I'm sure many here are now wanting to know.I'm sure many already know.
As the question is nonsense, there is no way to answer.Really? The levels of state and local law/ordinances underlying the federal level laws are unfamiliar to you?
I'm not trolling, but you might be.So are you trolling us or are you really that unfamiliar/ignorant with or of the real hierarchy of our nation's laws and legalities systems?
And feel free to do the same.Here's a link to the US constitution and its amendments. Feel free to quote and guide me and anyone else to the parts that support your opinions to be facts .
Who are these 'others'? Your imaginary friends?being I and likely a number of others here would like to know where and how we are reading things incorrectly
http://context.montpelier.org/docum...VQc0FZV4f_ZwGDzpuxO7NsanVlFkYShuoQaArWn8P8HAQ
Under the laws of his state, he had every right to carry in the fashion that he did. Please show the statute that denies him that right.What absolute baloney that he has a 'right' to carry. Not every swinging di#k has the "right" to carry. There is no guarantee of that.
A statute isn't a right. For an example of how they differ, see my comment above referring to which can be changed.Under the laws of his state, he had every right to carry in the fashion that he did. Please show the statute that denies him that right.
by Aaron Carman
by Don Wilcher
by Aaron Carman