The op amp's offset voltage is NOT what causes the integrating capacitor to charge up; it's the op amp's input bias current. This is why nearly all charge amp designs are done with FET-input op amps or CMOS op amps. Bipolar op amps are rarely (never?) used because of their substantial input bias current.The idealized circuit shown above is not a practical implementation because the op-amp’s offset voltage will charge up the capacitor and cause the amplifier to saturate.
I don't doubt that you're correct, but it's a little distressing considering I pulled that information directly from a TI app note: "The ideal integrator circuit will saturate to the supply rails depending on the polarity of the input offset voltage." My original statement was more vague, but after reading the description in the TI document I decided to specifically mention the offset voltage. So you're sure that the input bias current is the primary issue here? I honestly don't know much about the specifics in this case; all I can say is that my intuition tells me that some sort of nonideality somewhere in the circuit will eventually charge the cap and turn the op-amp into an open-loop amplifier.The op amp's offset voltage is NOT what causes the integrating capacitor to charge up; it's the op amp's input bias current. This is why nearly all charge amp designs are done with FET-input op amps or CMOS op amps. Bipolar op amps are rarely (never?) used because of their substantial input bias current.
I was hoping to avoid that level of detail, not only because the article was getting too long but also because my statements about the parallel capacitance not influencing circuit operation would become incorrect. If there is resistance connected to the inverting input, the internal capacitance and cable capacitance affect the frequency response.Also in the "A Realistic Charge Amplifier" section, the diagram should show a small resistor (I've usually used anywhere from 100Ω to 1 kΩ or so) isolating the piezo transducer and connecting cable from the op amp's inverting input and the integrating capacitor. This is often needed to avoid severe amplitude response peaking (or even oscillation) at high frequencies. I don't know whether or not you want to get that picky, though.
Yes, that certainly is disappointing, because it's dead wrong. What app note was this?I don't doubt that you're correct, but it's a little distressing considering I pulled that information directly from a TI app note: "The ideal integrator circuit will saturate to the supply rails depending on the polarity of the input offset voltage."
Absolutely, 100% certain. Input offset voltage is unimportant.So you're sure that the input bias current is the primary issue here?
That's true, but if the resistance is small it only affects the response at high frequencies, usually well above the highest signal frequency of interest. I've no objection to leaving that detail out, though, if it would complicate things.If there is resistance connected to the inverting input, the internal capacitance and cable capacitance affect the frequency response.
Much, MUCH better! Excellent article!I just posted the follow-up article:
https://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/...-amplifiers-for-piezoelectric-sensors.153206/
by Jeff Child
by Aaron Carman
by Jeff Child
by Jake Hertz