Got it.The "rectangles" were just for illustration. Other than that, they are just numbers -- in this case, real data for the process I am analyzing.
Using my suggested analysis on your data, I get 70.2% within 1 SD of the mean, 96.7% within 2SD and just 2 of the 57 at 2SD or above.
I tried it with over 1,100 random data points and got 67.4% within ±1SD , 96.1% within ±2SD, and 3.9% over 2SD. These compare well to the theoretical 68, 95 and 5% values for a perfect bell curve.
My analysis is visualized pretty well in the chart above, if x an y were independent. The key difference is that I normalize the distributions (subtract the mean from each point and divide by the SD) to produce a circle instead of an ellipse. That way, the distance from the central mean is a constant radius.