wouldn't it be easier to figure out the op's problem if the op posted a circuit schematic and the actual code he is working off of? Instead of some code snippet??? You guys can sit here and bicker about what each compiler does, but all it is accomplishing is NOTHING! For all you know the OP doesn't have it wired right or, he has something else in his code that is messing everything up... So I would suggest like we always suggest to all who posts a problem to "Post all off your code and a circuit schematic".

I do a lot of computer work for people and I find that the part that causes the most problems is in between the keyboard and the chair.


and even in MPASM, you can ignore the Bank Switching.... I always turn off error #302 in the MPASM compiler and I have never worried about bank switching when turning on/off a bit on a port...... only when configuring registers....

 

Sorry for the delay, thanks for the help. I have this issue resolved and now close this thread.

 

Sorry for the delay, thanks for the help. I have this issue resolved and now close this thread.

Are you at least going to tell us what the resolution was so all may benefit?

 

I am loosing faith that this chip is worth any more of my time, is tha PIC16F87/88 better?

1st Banks suck I hate them too. I've worked with the PIC16F877a and it was a really good chip but you still have to use banks.

 

Ogres and onions have layers.
PICs have banks
AVR's have neither