Yeah, mp3 is only a thing because of being in the right place at the right time and not because it was such a great format. It was briefly the standard currency of digitized (pirated) audio. But that brief interval was when most people first came into contact with digital song files. The files on CDs don't count, because they were not really 'files' to most people at the time. So mp3 files suddenly appeared everywhere just as the world was discovering they could fill their hard drives with pirated digital music files. Few bothered to go back and get better copies as better formats came along. That in turn helped iTunes since it was selling a clearly superior product cheaply enough that it wasn't worth your trouble to go around it.Personally, I'm not too miffed about the death of a, "standard" that has losses which are obvious to a trained ear.
Whatever comes next.
Stop you Vinyl blasphemer. To say the word mp3 in the same sentence as Vinyl is sacrilege.Just as with vinyl, there are internet trolls still extolling the virtues of the latest flavors of mp3. They must feel betrayed by this announcement.
Several Thumbs Up!Stop you Vinyl blasphemer. To say the word mp3 in the same sentence as Vinyl is sacrilege.
My Technics Linear tracking turntable and vinyl collection are insured by Smith&Wesson.Several Thumbs Up!
Somebody will sell my vinyl and my direct drive turntable after I'm dead.
Yes. What would good music be without the pops, cracks, wow, and flutter.My Technics Linear tracking turntable and vinyl collection are insured by Smith&Wesson.
I have thousands of 320k mp3 rips for casual listening but vinyl is the choice during serious music time.
Every time I look you up, I remember why you're on my Ignore list. Have you decided to be a full time troll on this site, or do you occasionally give helpful advice? Don't answer. The odds that I will again open the Ignores for this Thread are small because the rest of us can have an educational conversation without reading your attempts to get a reaction.Yes. What would good music be without the pops, cracks, wow, and flutter.
Instead of being a dick, why don't you just continue to ignore me?Every time I look you up, I remember why you're on my Ignore list. Have you decided to be a full time troll on this site, or do you occasionally give helpful advice? Don't answer. The odds that I will again open the Ignores for this Thread are small because the rest of us can have an educational conversation without reading your attempts to get a reaction.
With good equipment and vinyl you don't have pops, cracks, wow, and flutter (>0.025% WRMS on my player). My preferred digital format archive is 96/24 MLP Lossless DVD Audio for home and car (Kenwood deck with 5.1 96/24 MLP Lossless decoding) but MP3 sounds about as good in a car for most sourced materials.Yes. What would good music be without the pops, cracks, wow, and flutter.
My point is that a cheap CD player generally sounds better than a similarly priced turntable. In fact, I'd argue that, all else being equal, 5 out of 10 audiophiles would guess wrong in a proper A/B setup of similarly priced equipment.With good equipment and vinyl you don't have pops, cracks, wow, and flutter (>0.025% WRMS on my player). My preferred digital format archive is 96/24 MLP Lossless DVD Audio for home and car (Kenwood deck with 5.1 96/24 MLP Lossless decoding) but MP3 sounds about as good in a car for most sourced materials.
No question about that but I'm not doing a A/B setup evaluation because I know technically digital is better and cheaper. The aural pleasure I get from vinyl is purely based on an emotional response to music from physical records.My point is that a cheap CD player generally sounds better than a similarly priced turntable. In fact, I'd argue that, all else being equal, 5 out of 10 audiophiles would guess wrong in a proper A/B setup of similarly priced equipment.
Old B/W film noir with dark shadows and lighting perfectly used the artistic characteristics of cellulose acetate based media or nitrate before that.Hey, while we are at it, why don't we admit 1940s cellulose is a better motion picture format than bluray DVD on a ultraHD screen?
Understood, and acceptable. Same reason why I dig out the ol' TRS-80 every couple of months and play Big 5's version of Space Invaders.No question about that but I'm not doing a A/B setup evaluation because I know technically digital is better and cheaper. The aural pleasure I get from vinyl is purely based on an emotional response to music from physical records.
The problem with good analog recordings is that they can be high quality until you either play them or store them.Old B/W film noir with dark shadows and lighting perfectly used the artistic characteristics of cellulose acetate based media or nitrate before that.
No firmware updates available at the dealer?My car, 2016 model, only plays mp3 and wav. So. mp3 will live for at least another 5 years or so.