LED Current Limiting Resistor

Thread Starter

SimpleJoe

Joined Mar 22, 2016
38
I am currently building my own version of a word clock and have finally reached the stage where i need to connect the LEDs to the NPN outputs (yes i know there are schematics and ways to use shift registers and things to control the LEDs but this is my way). I am tossing up whether i should use current limiting resistors for each of the set of the LEDs (they are wired in parallel and vary from strings of 2 to 7 LEDs). i know it is always recommended that you put a resistor to limit the current of the source but i was wondering if i limited the input voltage to 3.4v (the nominal forward voltage of the LEDs) would the LEDs still receive too much current. this is based on my thinking that there is a voltage vs current curve that LEDs follow. my question is, is my thinking right and is there any downsides to this.

Thanks in advanced,
SimpleJoe
 

crutschow

Joined Mar 14, 2008
38,503
this is based on my thinking that there is a voltage vs current curve that LEDs follow. my question is, is my thinking right and is there any downsides to this.
It's not quite right.
Yes, there is a voltage-to-current curve for an LED but it is very non-linear, thus a small change in voltage (and differences between LEDs of the same type) can cause a large difference in the current for a small change in voltage.
That's why you always need some form or current limiting when powering an LED.
It can be either a resistor or a constant-current circuit.
LEDs are basically current operated devices.
 

Thread Starter

SimpleJoe

Joined Mar 22, 2016
38
If i were to set the voltage to 3.3v (which i know only allows the LEDs that im using to draw <20ma with some tolerance) on a step down converter would this create an issue. Its just that to get the same current flow i need really specific and relatively high current resistors (i only have a selection of 1/4 W and i found that they may need up to 1W) otherwise there a noticeable difference in light levels.

Thanks,
SimpleJoe
 

Picbuster

Joined Dec 2, 2013
1,058
(V_pwr - Vf_led)/(Led current wanted) delivers serial resistor. Vf and led current wanted from led data blad.
V_pwr = voltage available to feed led- resistor
Picbuster
 

hp1729

Joined Nov 23, 2015
2,304
I am currently building my own version of a word clock and have finally reached the stage where i need to connect the LEDs to the NPN outputs (yes i know there are schematics and ways to use shift registers and things to control the LEDs but this is my way). I am tossing up whether i should use current limiting resistors for each of the set of the LEDs (they are wired in parallel and vary from strings of 2 to 7 LEDs). i know it is always recommended that you put a resistor to limit the current of the source but i was wondering if i limited the input voltage to 3.4v (the nominal forward voltage of the LEDs) would the LEDs still receive too much current. this is based on my thinking that there is a voltage vs current curve that LEDs follow. my question is, is my thinking right and is there any downsides to this.

Thanks in advanced,
SimpleJoe
I have a desk lamp (LED) that I run on just an unregulated voltage, no current limiting. I run it well below the rated current, about 600 mA versus the rated 1.5 Amp and at 9 V versus the rated 12 V. It has been working fine for over a year but this is certainly not a suggested design. Will an applied voltage with no current limiting work? Yes. Is it a good idea for your design? Probably not.
 

BobTPH

Joined Jun 5, 2013
11,515
The issue you will have, with multiple LEDs, is that their brightness will vary when driven at the same voltage, even if this voltage is low enough to ensure that the max current is not exceeded.

Bob
 

dannyf

Joined Sep 13, 2015
2,197
it is doable without any resistors at all - not advisable;

it is also doable without individual resistors, but one resistor for a group of parallel leds, under certain conditions.

In general, you want to keep as many in serial as possible and have individual resistors.
 
Top