K-map Paradox?

Thread Starter

Nerfhurter

Joined Dec 10, 2010
9
Hello, I'm fairly new to electrical engineering, in my class we are working with 7 segment display (common anode).
I've come up with the following k-map truth table for "D" input (~ is NOT).
~Z Z
~X~Y 0 0
~X Y 1 1
X Y 1 0
X~Y 1 1

I used k-maps to get the following simplified expression Hi=~XY+X~Z+X~Y. For the third term I use an invert after ~XY, but that makes one expression ORd with its inverse. This is giving, as expected 1's for all possible inputs since I have one term ORd with its inverse all possible inputs give a 1. I'm wondering where I went wrong, any help is much appreciated.
 
I am a little confused at what simplification you are actually doing.

Are you saying that ~XY = ~(X~Y)?? This is not true. Try making a truth table for each of the terms in question...
 

Thread Starter

Nerfhurter

Joined Dec 10, 2010
9
So in terms of circuit design, if I have XnotY in a circuit and I want notXY, I know I can't invert XnotY but is there something I can do to reduce amount of gates, or do I just make another "branch" with notXY?
 
Top