Hope this not too off-topic. Here we go:
I plan on selling some of the common ICs (LM358s, LM317s, 7805s and the like) on my small online shop (targeted at hobbyists like myself). Now I could get the "good" ones from TI/ST/ON, or just source them from China for 1/10 the price. Since component quality and reliability are not a top priority in my case, I favor the cheaper way (obviously), but then the question is: How do I not accidentally violate anyone's intellectual property in the process?
It would be easy to tell if I was going to sell fake MacBooks with a Banana logo on them, but it doesn't seem to be that easy with most ICs: These are often sold by multiple manufacturers even under exactly the same name, so sourcing those parts from some anonymous fab in China would probably not be a problem - but where do I draw the line? Obviously, the parts should not be branded as "TI" when they are actually not (that's just common sense, glad I got that far), but when is putting "L7805CV" (or whatever it is going to be) on a clone fine, and when is it not?
Granted, I could spend a lot of time doing patent and trademark research, but that's just one big false negative waiting to sue silly me. Any insights you could share with me?
Thanks!
I plan on selling some of the common ICs (LM358s, LM317s, 7805s and the like) on my small online shop (targeted at hobbyists like myself). Now I could get the "good" ones from TI/ST/ON, or just source them from China for 1/10 the price. Since component quality and reliability are not a top priority in my case, I favor the cheaper way (obviously), but then the question is: How do I not accidentally violate anyone's intellectual property in the process?
It would be easy to tell if I was going to sell fake MacBooks with a Banana logo on them, but it doesn't seem to be that easy with most ICs: These are often sold by multiple manufacturers even under exactly the same name, so sourcing those parts from some anonymous fab in China would probably not be a problem - but where do I draw the line? Obviously, the parts should not be branded as "TI" when they are actually not (that's just common sense, glad I got that far), but when is putting "L7805CV" (or whatever it is going to be) on a clone fine, and when is it not?
Granted, I could spend a lot of time doing patent and trademark research, but that's just one big false negative waiting to sue silly me. Any insights you could share with me?
Thanks!