How do anti-radiation chips for mobiles work?

Thread Starter

bypassrestrictions

Joined Jun 1, 2021
107
If that device did work, and it doesn’t it would also stop the mobile from working since the radiation it emits is how it works.

The best rasdiation prevention decvice is the one they used to take those photos of the EMF meter, and it’s already built into the phone: the power switch.
According to the companies selling them, humans experience many problems when they come in contact with radiation, and they claim this is because radiation from cell phones, routers, etc are sine wave radiation and humans are used to random wave radiation. They claim their stickers change the sine wave radiation into random wave radiation, which is why it reduces the harm to the human body.

They suggest people do hand test to determine if the radiation really affects or not, they show it in this video, it is from a reputable Indian news channel:


You'll see that when the man keeps his arms outstretched without holding anything, and when the woman tries to push it down, he is able to resist it, but when he does the same while holding a cell phone, he is unable to resist it and his arms go down, this they say is happening because radiation from the cell phone is interfering with his brains electrical activity and preventing him from resisting the push. They again show this with another cell phone with anti-radiation chip attached to it, and when he holds this new cell phone with sticker attached his is again able to resist the push.

It doesn't seem like it was faked to me.

Below is an MIT endorsement for similar product from a different company.

mit endorsement.png
 

Ya’akov

Joined Jan 27, 2019
10,259
According to the companies selling them, humans experience many problems when they come in contact with radiation, and they claim this is because radiation from cell phones, routers, etc are sine wave radiation and humans are used to random wave radiation. They claim their stickers change the sine wave radiation into random wave radiation, which is why it reduces the harm to the human body.

They suggest people do hand test to determine if the radiation really affects or not, they show it in this video, it is from a reputable Indian news channel:


You'll see that when the man keeps his arms outstretched without holding anything, and when the woman tries to push it down, he is able to resist it, but when he does the same while holding a cell phone, he is unable to resist it and his arms go down, this they say is happening because radiation from the cell phone is interfering with his brains electrical activity and preventing him from resisting the push. They again show this with another cell phone with anti-radiation chip attached to it, and when he holds this new cell phone with sticker attached his is again able to resist the push.

It doesn't seem like it was faked to me.

Below is an MIT endorsement for similar product from a different company.

View attachment 259828
This is still nonsense.

Does EM radiation adversely affect humans? Perhaps.
Does this product do anything at all to stop it if it does? No.

That “arm test” is the same nonsense that was used in the 1970s to push the idea that sugar was terrible for you. It was the exact same bogus demonstration, and could not be reproduced when the people involved were not confederates.

Think about it, can you talk on your mobile phone and pick something up at the same time? Can you talk on the phone and walk without falling over? This is a scam, and it is exactly like so many scams before it.

That pull quote never appeared in the MIT Technology Review. There is no such thing as ”changing their nature from a constant wave to a random one”, have you even tried to search for anything related to this in the publication? That quote could never have appeared in it it, in any case. They never would have referred to “personal gadgets or “elctromagnetic rays”.

This is pure nonsense, though at least they were clever enough to realize they couldn’t claim to be blocking the signal.

It might be hard to believe people would simply lie like this, but look at the money involved. People are willing to sell their integrity for less than that, unfortunately.
 

Ian0

Joined Aug 7, 2020
13,158
they claim this is because radiation from cell phones, routers, etc are sine wave radiation and humans are used to random wave radiation.
Better consult Monsieur Fourier on that one!

There is no data encoded on a sinewave of fixed frequency. Radiation from routers would be very similar to white noise.
 

Thread Starter

bypassrestrictions

Joined Jun 1, 2021
107
This is still nonsense.

Does EM radiation adversely affect humans? Perhaps.
Does this product do anything at all to stop it if it does? No.

That “arm test” is the same nonsense that was used in the 1970s to push the idea that sugar was terrible for you. It was the exact same bogus demonstration, and could not be reproduced when the people involved were not confederates.

Think about it, can you talk on your mobile phone and pick something up at the same time? Can you talk on the phone and walk without falling over? This is a scam, and it is exactly like so many scams before it.

That pull quote never appeared in the MIT Technology Review. There is no such thing as ”changing their nature from a constant wave to a random one”, have you even tried to search for anything related to this in the publication? That quote could never have appeared in it it, in any case. They never would have referred to “personal gadgets or “elctromagnetic rays”.

This is pure nonsense, though at least they were clever enough to realize they couldn’t claim to be blocking the signal.

It might be hard to believe people would simply lie like this, but look at the money involved. People are willing to sell their integrity for less than that, unfortunately.
I searched mit.edu with those words and I couldn't find any. I thought they removed or somethings, but they have that MIT quote on their website and other websites selling that product.

Here is a patent for anti-radiation chip: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2012063224A1/en
 
Last edited:

Thread Starter

bypassrestrictions

Joined Jun 1, 2021
107
There were American companies - reputable American Aerospace companies - that developed some similar EM-absorbing patches back in the late 1990s - early 2000s (before limits on emissions were set). They were essentially an elastomer with ferrite powder, iron powder or various muMetal or similar absorbing alloy powders belended in.

They certainly work to attenuate signals and surprisingly easy to make if you can get the powder concentration high enough. People who dismiss the technology have never looked into details of how their phones are made. Most phones have one or more elastomer patches that keep the signals where they belong on a device with so many antennas and oscillators. Gasket materials on devices with metal housings use these to prevent signal leakage and even stealth aircraft use these patch elastomer materials.

here is a recent patent for a formulation. Don't let anyone tell you a properly formulated patch doesn't work.
https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-adv.htm&r=6&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&p=1&S1=(((Radiation+AND+absorbing)+AND+elastomer)+AND+(iron+OR+ferrite))&OS=Radiation+and+absorbing+and+elastomer+and+(iron+or+ferrite)&RS=(((Radiation+AND+absorbing)+AND+elastomer)+AND+(iron+OR+ferrite))
Is it possible to make an elastomer to target particular frequency or it targets every frequency?
 

crutschow

Joined Mar 14, 2008
38,544
It might be hard to believe people would simply lie like this,
Not really.
I get junk mail and junk calls everyday telling my one of my accounts (PayPal, Amazon, Bank, etc.) has been compromised, and I need to contact them immediately with my login and password to correct it.
There's just a whole shit-load of crooked, lazy, lying people out there trying to make an illegal buck by conning some poor sap.
 

Ya’akov

Joined Jan 27, 2019
10,259
Not really.
I get junk mail and junk calls everyday telling my one of my accounts (PayPal, Amazon, Bank, etc.) has been compromised, and I need to contact them immediately with my login and password to correct it.
There's just a whole shit-load of crooked, lazy, lying people out there trying to make an illegal buck by conning some poor sap.
Yes, but that's anonymous lying. These are people on television personally lying. They are looking serious on camera and repeating things they know aren't true, and they are taking money from people on account of it.

For me, it is qualitatively different to be a known person and to lie so blatantly to an audience that has developed some trust in you than to send spam emails, or read a script in a call center where your personal reputation is never on the line.

It is harder to believe that something so blatant and public is a scam than an email or phone call, which is one of the reasons it succeeds.
 

MrSalts

Joined Apr 2, 2020
2,767
For me, it is qualitatively different to be a known person and to lie so blatantly to an audience that has developed some trust in you than to send spam emails, or read a script in a call center where your personal reputation is never on the line.

It is harder to believe that something so blatant and public is a scam than an email or phone call, which is one of the reasons it succeeds.
I saw a guy on TV, I think he is a president of some SuperPower with nuclear weapons, he was telling his people that a small country without nukes was planning to attack his country so he preemptively invaded.

I'm learning that the general public has an easy time believing blatant lies and tends to doubts half-truths.
 

SamR

Joined Mar 19, 2019
5,499
Just put on your tin foil hat and all will be well in the universe. What is really pesky is all that 50/60 Hz radiation being blasted out by my house wiring. It gets so bad sometimes I have to trip the main breaker and sit in the dark just to think clearly.
 
Top