no, i want to know what is the high-impedance statehi Alex,
Are you asking what is the actual impedance value.?
E
what is the use of a tristate device?hi Alex,
When both output MOSFET's are Off, ie: non-conducting.
Usually referred to as Tri-state devices.
E
Nohi,
Often Used on Address and Databus lines, allows more than one output device/s to be connected to the same Bus line, without loading the other driving/receiving devices.
E
Is this a Homework problem.?
After reading the link you share right now I have a better understanding of high Z and tristate buffer thanks brohi,
OK,
If the devices are CMOS technology, there will off course be some current draw by the device from the 5V supply, in order to keep the device active.
But the actual output will not source or sink current.
E
Did you read the link I posted in Post #4.?
I think you missed the announcements from NS about 30-years ago (early 1990s) when they said their failure to enforce and protect their trademark caused several to become a standard term of commerce so they elected not renew those trademarked terms - including Tri-state. TI never had anything to do with the decision.It should really be referred to as three-state, not tri-state. The term tri-state is a registered trademark of National Semiconductor (now part of TI). However, I think that it is considered dead and non-revivable by the USPTO (but since TI continues to use it, they have common-law rights to it and, legally, no one else can use it for the same purposes). Having said that, I suspect NS (and now TI) have long since given up trying to defend it.
Thanks for looking that up. Did they get the new Trademark for a circuit input or for the Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia invitational basketball tournament?Yes, I missed that. The trademark (0941335) expired in '93 and was not renewed at that time, but NS did file a renewal in '97 that was granted (2138646) and then renewed in 2007 for an additional ten years, meaning that it was transferred to Texas Instruments when they bought NS in 2011. The trademark was not renewed in 2017 (which would have been a TI decision) and was administratively cancelled in 2021 by the USPTO. It's status under common-law can really only be determined if tested in the courts by someone else attempting to trademark it.
For "integrated circuits and data sheet manuals sold as a unit therewith".Thanks for looking that up. Did they get the new Trademark for a circuit input or for the Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia invitational basketball tournament?