i also want to know advantage if opam AD8671 used instead place of AD8221 any noise increase? in LTspice simulation OpamAD8671 foolwer circuit dont show signal vack frlow from output pin to input pin while in case og AD8221 i observe back signal flowWhat, in general, is the purpose of a voltage follower? In addition to "following the voltage", what other effect does it have?
i also want to know advantage if opam AD8671 used instead place of AD8221 any noise increase? in LTspice simulation OpamAD8671 foolwer circuit dont show signal vack frlow from output pin to input pin while in case og AD8221 i observe back signal flowWhat, in general, is the purpose of a voltage follower? In addition to "following the voltage", what other effect does it have?
Yes, i wonder what advantage of usinf AD8221 over AD8671? that sine wave will come from function generator of other circuit.
Also why 50K and 10K resistor used with AD8221 in In1 and In2 . where sine/ triangular wave put by In1 and In2i also want to know advantage if opam AD8671 used instead place of AD8221 any noise increase? in LTspice simulation OpamAD8671 foolwer circuit dont show signal vack frlow from output pin to input pin while in case og AD8221 i observe back signal flow
Yes, i wonder what advantage of usinf AD8221 over AD8671? that sine wave will come from function generator of other circuit.
Ideally Vout should not change but remain constant in my uploaded filehi j,
It is important that I have your version of the asc file, so that I can see your problem.
Please post your LTS asc file.
E
hi j,) Why in first place instrumental amplifier AD8221 used instead can we use opam? what kind of problem we face if we use opam instead instrumental amplifier? As both work seems in principal .