Yes, the first 20 years I was NAVAIR community and the last 25 or so years it was Nuclear Navy NAVSEA community. so aircraft carriers and submarines. All of my spending was scrutinized and if I wanted to deviate from an approved vendor list I had to justify my request and I think prayer helped. Real familiar with spend it or lose it too. You get a budgeted or allocation amount you spend every dime or next year you will see less when you might need more.I had no idea you were affiliated with the Nuclear Navy. I'm sure I knew something about CRDMs and RPIs at one point, long enough to get my submarine warfare qualification, but that isn't something that stayed committed to memory. I DO remember filling out supply chits and box of pens was over $100. I don't know this for sure, but I strongly suspect there were no certificates of traceability provided for the pens. I think there is more to it than the good reasons you cited. I think the military is accustomed to paying more for everything, so they just do. They have no incentive to shop around for a better price, on anything. If anything, the opposite. I remember my chief telling us to put together a needs list and wish list; any budget left over after needs was spent on "needs" because if we didn't use up the whole budget, we wouldn't get a full budget the next go-round.
On another interesting note the earlier reactor plants used on the Nimitz Class carriers had roughly a 20 year life span before refueling. The new reactor plants should run much longer before refueling. On the subs LOS (Life Of Ship) or about 40 years. It was strange to know that the men and women who would be commanding the ships I was building for when I retired likely had not been born yet.
Anyway, it was a great career and you get a real good dose of what spending is all about and learn why the $12.49 hammer becomes a $500.00 hammer.
We now return to drones which are pretty cool and actually useful when not abused and played with for all the wrong reasons.
Ron





