@LowQCab was a very active member and I just noticed he hasn’t been around for a whlie. I PM’d him here a couple of days ago with no response so I am wondering if anyone knows if he is OK.

The pandemic makes disappearing more alarming than it would otherwise be and it would be nice ot know that everything is well with him.

 

Maybe he got caught in his own prediction. He did after all predict that heads would explode after the first of the year.

 

@LowQCab was a very active member and I just noticed he hasn’t been around for a whlie. I PM’d him here a couple of days ago with no response so I am wondering if anyone knows if he is OK.

The pandemic makes disappearing more alarming than it would otherwise be and it would be nice ot know that everything is well with him.

Everything is fine now.
I just got 40-days in Jail for a 5-year-old unpaid Traffic-Ticket !!!
Thanks for asking.

It will take a few days, ( or maybe a week ),
to catch-up on ~1200 Emails that I've received over the last 40-days,
as well as getting my Computer repaired and back up to par.

Bonus ....... I may have gained a ~1200-Dollar per week part-time-job in the process,
doing pretty-much anything I care to do,
( mostly "gofer" errands, and/or, High-End-Handyman/Maintenance ),
working with a Multi-Million-Dollar / 5-employee company that sells DIRT,
( yes, the Soil You walk on, that usually has Grass growing on top of it ),
for massive construction projects like new Highways or new Housing-Subdivisions, Golf-Courses, etc..

The "Boss" flies around in a Custom-Outfitted, Twin-Turbo-Prop, 8-Seat, Helicopter, and refuses to retire.

Sometimes being introduced to the "right-people" has it's perks !!!
.
.
.

 

40 days in jail for a traffic ticket!!!?????

 

holly mackerel, what did you park and where?

 

Yep, Pinellas, County has some pretty serious government fraud and corruption,
but it's not limited to just Florida, study your State's Motor-Vehicle-"Codes", ( NOT "LAWS" ),
( They are all about ~95% identical, and all ~100% fraudulent,
and, they are based on completely fraudulent "Contracts", outright Lies, and very intentional deceptions ,
and are written, and up-dated, by a consortium of huge Insurance-Companies,
( which are actually Big-Banks, run by "Organized-Crime" "Banksters" ),
which are then "approved" or "adopted by", your State-Legislature.
And Yes,
I studied Law part-time for almost 4-years and
was Tutored by Email by a retired "Constitutional-Law", and "Contract-Law", Attorney in the early ~2000's.

It's all about creating "special-definitions" for "seemingly" "common" words.
Most of my "Law-Education" was spent learning where to find the "special-definitions", and then
re-learning everything I "thought" I already knew about "governments" and "Laws".

But, it's all good ......
the whole corrupted system is being dismantled right now,
but it may take another ~10-years for completion and gradual replacement,
it's a painfully sSSSLLLOOOOWWW process.

We are in an "Information-WAR", right now.
It was started even before the USA was completely established,
and it was radically escalated with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in the '60's,
and escalated even further with 9/11.
Fake-Education,
Fake-Wars,
Fake-News,
Fake-governments,
Fake-Money,
Fake-Laws.
.
.
.

 

Hola LQC

40 days sounds too much for a ticket...

Friendly suggestion: next time try to be Caught in Providence.

Be well.

 

40 days sounds too much for a ticket...

If you read between the lines in post #6 it was probalby a contempt of court sentence. My middle son got 30 days for a similar thing, refusing to pay a ticket or do community service when told to.

 

The official "charge" on the "court-order" was "failure to appear".

The reality of it is, is that the "judge" in this case, is not a "Judge", ( with a capitalized "J" ),
but an "Administrative-Clerk", and has no Lawful-Power to issue such an Un-Lawful "court-order",
as there is no "Lawful-Contract" binding me to this "administrative court", or to anyone or anything else.
Any and all Contracts claimed by this "court" are instantly fraudulent because of extensive use of,
deceptive and vague wording/language contained in the claimed "contracts",
and therefore, there is no "Agreement" between the Parties,
and therefore, the Contracts "do not exist" under Law,
and therefore, the supposed contract(s) are not "Lawfully-Enforceable",
and therefore, any and all actions taken by the court against me are completely Criminal in nature.

Not that any of this really matters,
because we have almost zero Lawful-Courts left in this country.
Instead, we now have a "legal-system",
which is operating completely under "Admiralty-Law", ( the Law of the Sea ),
rather than "Constitutional-Law" and "Common-Law", ( the Law of the LAND ),
therefore our existing "legal-system" is, by definition, a bunch of stinking "PIRATES ON THE LAND".

"Pirates on the Land"
is an actual, properly defined, term/description in Law,
( I didn't just "make it up" out of thin air, and it is not "my opinion",
it's a real thing, and has existed for, at least, several thousand years, possibly more ).

They are "Lawless-Invaders" in/on our Land, and should be exterminated by "We the People",
( only the ones who are aware that they actually are Pirates,
not the average, completely clueless, government employees/workers ).
.
.
.

 

Reminds me of a friend who ignored a homeowner's association complaint about weeds in his lawn. He was convinced that the court in which he was sued had no authority to hear his case. Then they sold his house at auction. He was in the right, but now he lives with his mother.

 

Reminds me of a friend who ignored a homeowner's association complaint about weeds in his lawn. He was convinced that the court in which he was sued had no authority to hear his case. Then they sold his house at auction. He was in the right, but now he lives with his mother.

That sort of thing happens thousands of times per day,
but You will never hear about it in ANY Main-Stream-Media.
Guess who's been running all Main-Stream-Media ...........

Those types of situations, unfortunately, may actually turn-out to be legitimate, and Lawful-Contracts,
but people routinely give-up all of their Rights for some imagined "value".
Go figure .......
.
.
.

 

rather than "Constitutional-Law" and "Common-Law", ( the Law of the LAND ),
therefore our existing "legal-system" is, by definition, a bunch of stinking "PIRATES ON THE LAND".

I'd say your wrong about that, from the little you give here it seems you were tried under FLA. Chapter 120 rules. Being those rules were set out by your state, they are therefore"Law of the Land". Rule of the land enough that you spent 40 days under their care and boarding.

 

I'd say your wrong about that.
Well, You are certainly entitled to your opinion, however,
I thrashed this particular subject for YEARS, and with extremely experienced Tutelage as well.

I am precisely correct in the admittedly over-simplified outline that I presented.

I neglected to get into "Contract-Law" because I'm
already presenting a huge mouthful for most people to bite-off in one sitting.

Virtually all "statutory" "law" is not legitimate "Law" at all,
within the context of Constitutional-Law, and Common-Law, and Contract-Law.
Automatically making it FRAUDULENT.
There is simply no way to circumvent this FACT, regardless of what You may "believe".

"statutory" "law" CAN NOT supersede Constitutional-Law, or Common-Law,
under ANY circumstances except in the case of a LEGITIMATE-CONTRACT.

Any Contract must be FULLY-UNDERSTOOD in every detail, by BOTH Parties,
and BOTH Parties must be in COMPLETE AGREEMENT,
on all stipulations/points in the Contract,
and there must be ZERO, Threats, Duress, or Coercions, to or from ANY Party,
and,
ANY ACTIONS, or INACTION'S by either Party to the Contract,
that would constitute a "Breech" of that Contract,
must be CLEARLY DEFINED, and completely understood, by BOTH Parties to the Contract,
and will result in the Contract becoming instantly NULL and VOID, and without any "Binding-Effect",
unless it is specifically stipulated by both Parties that there shall be a "Personal-Damage" created,
to one Party or the other,
in the case of specific, and well defined, actions, or inactions, by one of the Parties
that shall be considered to be a "Breech-of-Contract" by the "Damaged-Party"
as clearly-defined, and completely agreed-to, in the Contract.

ALL "statutory-laws" are purposefully vague, and extremely confusing,
even to very experienced Law-Professors,
and are subject to various "interpretations",
therefore they cannot possibly constitute a
legitimate, and binding, Contract with ANY "Living-Soul",
or any "Created-Entity", ( corporations/governments ),
EVER.
ALL "statutory-laws" are jam-packed with
"common-sounding-words" which have hidden "special-definitions".
Therefore, NO ONE can possibly Completely-Understand, and Completely-Agree-to,
the Terms of the supposed "Contract-in-Law",
so there never was any legitimate Contract that had any possibility
of even being considered to be plausible in the first place.

The "corp" in the word corporation is loosely defined as a "DEAD-THING".
It is NOT POSSIBLE to have a legitimate Contract with a "Dead-Thing".

Contracts can only be created between "Living-Souls",
therefore, NO ONE has a legitimate, enforceable, Contract with "State-of-Florida-Incorporated" ,
or any AGENT of said corporation.

Any Agent of any corporation claiming to have POWER over the God-Given-Freedoms of any "Living-Soul"
is nothing but a Criminal, and a "Pirate-on-the-Land".

There is no such thing as a "Non-Breakable" Contract.
Either Party may break the Contract at any time, but, there may be consequences that were
previously completely agreed upon in the creation of the Contract,
that may be enforceable against the Party who has chosen to break the Contract, in a Common-Law-Court.

It is impossible, by definition, to be "forced" into a Contract.
Where there is any lack of Complete-Agreement, or Complete-Understanding,
of any and all Terms of the supposed Contract,
THEN THERE NEVER WAS ANY CONTRACT AT ANY TIME.
( the "Legal-Term" for a situation like this is referred to as "ab-initio",
which loosely means "invalid from the beginning" )

A new Contract, that is designed to replace an existing Contract may be created at
any time that complete agreement between the Parties is established regarding the new Terms.

There may be a few pertinent details left out, or possibly even technically incorrect,
as I'm writing this based on memory from ~25-years ago,
and I don't practice the use of this subject routinely.
I will gladly entertain any corrections, or discussion, from anyone with more practice than I .

Fortunately, this "corporation" conundrum is currently in the process of
being corrected, and/or, completely abolished.

Unfortunately,
it will take WAY too much time to suit my personal-preferences,
possibly as much as ~10-years or more,
but then again, I'm not God, and don't want to be,
and I don't personally make any of the rules, or set the schedule.

BTW, all of this stuff is also contained in the Bible, and may other religious texts,
although it's usually not in such a "cut-and-dried", and blatant-form.
.
.
.

 

I will gladly entertain any corrections, or discussion, from anyone with more practice than I .

As long as it doesn't come from me I guess. It seems you like my son I mentioned earlier, think that your thoughts are law, but when others express things they have only opinions. Sorry but your ideas are only opinions on how the law works and is applied.

Making every "case" that goes to court appear before a "real"(your word)judge would be very, very costly, and who would bear that cost? Those appearing before a judge in court. But good luck getting your opinions into real law.

I don't personally make any of the rules, or set the schedule.

But those that can do. That's why you lost 40 days of your freedom and life. I can think of better ways to spend 40 days.

BTW, all of this stuff is also contained in the Bible, and may other religious texts

And to rebut that, you claim only constitutional law holds, and no religious law is constitutional, though some constitutional law may be based on them.

 

Back to the original topic, it seems that things are not at all well for @LowQCab
I can't say that I care much for his beef with the legal system.

 

Yes, and I am glad that he's ok.

 

@LowQCab I believe you are entirely sincere in your beliefs as you laid them out but I wanted to say that I believe, after a lot of research, the “sovereign citizen“ or “free man on the land” movement is based on fictitious premises.

I am very well informed concerning the arguments based on common and contract law but after carefully investigating it I have found it to lack an actual basis. The idea that people have been turned to commerce, that ALL CAPS matters, that statutes require a contractual relationship, that the United States is a corporation, and all the other elements of this thing are simply counterfactual and based on random parts of unrelated documents and a false recounting of history.

I was concerned about you and if you were OK. I am glad you were not ill or injured, but I have to say I worry about you because of this confused philosophy. I am sincerely concerned.

None of this is intended as a slight or comment on your intelligence or honesty but having started this thread I felt compelled to express how much I disagree with the things you are saying. I don’t believe the facts support your view, and I have looked at them quite carefully.

I have no ill will and wish you no harm of misfortune, but I feel very disconnected from the world you are living in and find it uncomfortable and damaging to society.

 

I have zero problems with people finding disagreement with my statements.
Totally fine .........

The only really important and valuable reason for my comments are to get other people
to "think-outside-the-box", which, unfortunately, many, many people can not seem to do,
or, they are stuck with "what they've been told",
or, "what they believe-in",
rather than actually spending years of study,
IN COMPLETE DISBELIEF, that any of this could possibly be true.

My Tutor, with over ~40-years of Law experience, never referred me to ANY
document that contained even the slightest amount of "opinion" or speculation.
Every document was either "Court-Decisions", as well as documented "Historical-Events",
actual current "law", and Historical-Governmental-Law-Decisions,
including the fluent use of, "Blacks-Law-Dictionary", ( which is quite often referred to as the "Law-Bible" ),
of which I was expected to know by heart, at least ~75 complete definitions and the functioning,
and reason for each one.
And he demanded discussion, in writing, as to why the various types of Laws have been
constructed in the way that they are.

I demonstrated, to myself in person, and sometimes at substantial expense,
how much corruption and criminality there is in our various governments, (USA),
( which usually turns out to be a valid trend worldwide ).

I actually KNOW, from study and experience,
I have zero doubts,
and I also know the reasons behind these problems.

I'm not telling anyone to "believe" me,
I'm presenting what I know to be a serious problem,
which could easily be the source of some serious problems, for anyone.

I simply think You should study this for yourself, rather than depend upon someone else's "opinion".
Most people won't bother, I get it,
but there may be "somebody" out there who may benefit themselves, or others, from this info.
.
.
.

 

The "corp" in the word corporation is loosely defined as a "DEAD-THING"

Again you are making this up, to suit your tastes. "The word "corporation" derives from corpus, the Latin word for body, or a "body of people". From - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation

And for traffic and other driving related things, if you have a drivers license or license plates you signed a contract with the stat to abide by the laws they have. Or that's the way it works in my state.

Not trying to fight with you at all, I've already had this fight with my son about a similar situation. He took it to the point that he lost his driving privileges and has a couple of warrants for his arrest in the adjacent county to where he lives. It's just not worth it!

 

I'm doing it again ???
When was the first time I "made something up" ?
I have zero reasons to "make-up" anything,
and I have no one,
and don't want anyone around me,
who needs to be impressed.............

Wikipedia is equivalent to getting your Law information from "The National Enquirer" Newspaper.
There are paid actors who's job it is is to permanently maintain
a "desired narrative" on many particular subjects listed in Wikipedia.
It's probably the absolute worst place online to get Law information.

Black's Law Dictionary defines a corporation as "an association of shareholders (or even a single shareholder) created under law,
and regarded as an artificial person by courts,
"having a legal entity entirely separate and distinct from the individuals who compose it,
with the capacity of continuous existence or succession,
and having the capacity of such legal entity, of taking, holding and conveying property,
suing and being sued,
and exercising such other powers as may be conferred on it by law, just as a natural person may."

A Corporation can not possibly be a "Natural-Person",
since it is completely formed out of thin air, and is "granted" existence,
therefore it does not have Life, as a "Natural-Person" or a "Living-Soul" does,
and therefore it is considered to be a "Dead-Thing" when addressed in a proper Court of Law.

A "Court of Admiralty",
( which is well over 90% of the Courts in this Country ),
MAY NOT ADDRESS,
or even acknowledge the existence of,
a "Natural-Person", or a "Living-Soul",
but may only address "Fictional-Corporate-Entities",
which also must fall under their specific and limited, Jurisdiction,
( which entities are by definition, dead, simply because they are fictional, and not real ).

Just because You find something hard to believe, doesn't automatically mean that it's "made-up",
quite often it's simply a matter of it differing from what you've been told all your life,
which may not have been accurate, or could have even been a malicious deception, ( which is very common ).
.
.
.