Kind friends

In the veritable 'throws' of my struggle with my connection (my end/my problem) I seem to have discovered a rather bizarre AAC/Xenforo 'bug' -- although apparently harmless enough I felt this report was advisable as per 'little acorns', 'tiny drops of poison', 'down-bound snowballs', etc...

So Puleeeze! Don't 'dun me to death' with 'what does it matter?' ! - I'm being a good 'citizen' ...K!?

To cut to the chase:
User statistics are only sporadically updated (and, so it seems, occasionally neglected altogether) on all but the last page of threads when viewed from an 'unlogged session'

With reference to the attached images:
The first image (viewed logged-in) shows correct user participation statistics and the post's accolades ('like flags', if you will)
The second image (viewed 'logged-out') shows 'stale' user participation stats -- please note also that the "user __ likes this" accolade is missing from post #20

As seen from a 'logged-in' session


As seen from an 'unlogged' session


Best regards
HP

 

HP I know it! Only most recent page of threads are active for logged off users except in rare random instances. So I say it's way to conserve site overhead by making completed pages totally static to logged off view? So I don't know if editing a post changes it for guests or not but I say probably it's just _flaggy_ stuff that doesn't update cuz it would be self defeating to maintain separate databases for members and guests!

 

HP I know it! Only most recent page of threads are active for logged off users except in rare random instances. So I say it's way to conserve site overhead by making completed pages totally static to logged off view? So I don't know if editing a post changes it for guests or not but I say probably it's just _flaggy_ stuff that doesn't update cuz it would be self defeating to maintain separate databases for members and guests!

Sounds reasonable -- In any event I've done my 'civic' duty!

Best regards
HP

 

Sounds reasonable -- In any event I've done my 'civic' duty!

Best regards
HP

Geez, HP, what does it matter!

Is that what you were hoping for?

 

My dad used to analyze the honorific "expert" as follows:

An "ex" is a has been. A "spirt"is a drip under pressure.

John

 

My dad used to analyze the honorific "expert" as follows:

An "ex" is a has been. A "spirt"is a drip under pressure.

John

Also, what does EXPERT have to do with this thread?

 

Can't you read?

John

 

Can't you read?

John

I can. You were the first to mention "EXPERT" on this thread and, since it is completely out of context, I thought I would ask about the genesis of your thought. So, to use your phraseology, "can't you answer?"

 

what does it matter!

--Emphasis added--

Calm down! - I'm only talking "the guest's eye view" of AAC fora -- Tis not like Benghazi or anything...

You were the first to mention "EXPERT"

Well... Technically speaking, 'expert' appears on this thread prior to @jpanhalt 's post -- Preclusion of WWIII (and eschewal of offense to those with whom I've absolutely no quarrel whatever), however, demand that I leave further detail in abeyance

TTFN
HP

 

Calm down! - I'm only talking "the guest's eye view" of AAC fora -- Tis not like Benghazi or anything...

ROFLOL!

Well... Technically speaking, 'expert' appears on this thread prior to @jpanhalt 's post -- Preclusion of WWIII (and eschewal of offense to those with whom I've absolutely no quarrel whatever), however, demand that I leave further detail in abeyance

HP I say you're right to not touch that with a 10' pole And I better stay away from it too cuz average Pole can't be any safer!