12v to 9.6v

Thread Starter

seesoe

Joined Dec 7, 2008
99
not sure.. i guess not much, its a simple board that chargers a cap and has dip switch bus to change the rate of fire and when to fire the cap that triggers a solenoid.
 

Wendy

Joined Mar 24, 2008
23,797
The diodes will probably be more efficient for this application, but either will work. Be prepared for the LM317 to get hot.
 

jj_alukkas

Joined Jan 8, 2009
753
I know Diodes are good but a very exact voltage is hard to obtain, and you need higher current diodes, not 1N400x.. It will be good initially but voltage will not be stable as it heats up... LM317 can stand 1500mA if properly used.. Try this one and calculate the exact voltage using the formula.. you will get the resistor.. Verify it with a multimeter.. And be sure to mount a heatsink..
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Bill_Bowden/page12.htm
 

Wendy

Joined Mar 24, 2008
23,797
Depends on how you define stable, I doubt this circuit will pull much, not with batteries rated at 170mah. At an amp their lifespan is around 10 minutes. This is a 9V equivalent, which isn't a very high current source (100ma would be pretty high), so those diodes will be accurate to within .1V over the range most likely.

LM317 is a good part with good regulation, but it is major overkill for this application. The other issue is those diodes will be very wirelike, which means they will fit in a very small space.

Truth to tell though, I don't really care either way. I have used both with good results.
 

Thread Starter

seesoe

Joined Dec 7, 2008
99
thank you jj for all the suggestions, im the type of guy that likes to make electronics applications complicated, and i really want to use the LM317 but the application is a very simple little project and the diodes will work just right i think. bill is correct it will be wire like and i can just heat shrink it, but the lm317 will need heatsink and stuff im pretty lazy haha.

anyways thanks all for the help ill report back with the results:)
 

jj_alukkas

Joined Jan 8, 2009
753
Thanks for that seesoe, I came to know only recently that the LM317 doesn't need a heatsink if the load is below 500mA. Thats why I suggested it. We all have situations requiring a supply voltage and resistors don't seem to work well with load so i found LM317 as a risk free solution thought a bit costly. I haven't had tried diodes yet thats why I didn't recc that.. ANyway thanks everyone for the info and I'll try diodes next time.. Thanks Bill for the suggession.
 

SgtWookie

Joined Jul 17, 2007
22,230
Thanks for that seesoe, I came to know only recently that the LM317 doesn't need a heatsink if the load is below 500mA.
This is not correct!
The important part is how much power dissipation is occuring in the regulator itself. Ambient temperature is important too...

Let's do an example. Let's say you made a 10v supply using an LM317 that itself was getting power from a 12v supply. You have a 20 Ohm load on the output (total) for a 500mA output current.
So, you have a 2v drop across the regulator itself, and 500mA going through it.
P=EI, or Power(Watts) = Voltage * Current
P = 2V * 500mA = 2*.5 = 1 Watt of power to dissipate as heat.

Now let's say we're going to use that same regulator circuit, and load but power it from a 30v supply instead of a 12v supply. Now we're dropping 20V across the regulator!
P = 20V * 500mA = 20*.5 = 10 Watts of power to dissipate as heat, 10 times as much as before!
 

jj_alukkas

Joined Jan 8, 2009
753
Thats correct.. It Depends on Load And Drop volatge. But I have found that it rarely heats up when I drive 4 leds on a supply of 12v regulated to 2.8v. Here his application drops 2.4v only and requires some more than a 100mA... But I agree to what you pointed.
 
Last edited:
Top