Question:
Answer:
Literature source [POZAR] available here:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Microwave-Engineering-David-M-Pozar/dp/0470631554
There's also a solutions manual available here:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/176505749/Microwave-engineering-pozar-4th-Ed-solutions-manual
the solutions manual erroneously solves for single stub, ignoring X2, the reactance of the 2nd stub.
The sought solutions have to be of the following shape
· D_OCstub1(d,RL,XL)
· D_OCstub2(d,RL,XL)
· D_SCstub1(d,RL,XL)
· D_SCstub2(d,RL,XL)
the RL constraint would imply that there would be need for a really long transmission line for really small RL values, or that there would be need for really short transmission line when attempting to match large RL values.
Numerical and symbolic equations are supplied. For the numerical case 2D slice
is not as meaningful as visualizing the volume with both a static and a shifting plane
John BG
jgb2012@sky.com
Answer:
Literature source [POZAR] available here:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Microwave-Engineering-David-M-Pozar/dp/0470631554
There's also a solutions manual available here:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/176505749/Microwave-engineering-pozar-4th-Ed-solutions-manual
the solutions manual erroneously solves for single stub, ignoring X2, the reactance of the 2nd stub.
The sought solutions have to be of the following shape
· D_OCstub1(d,RL,XL)
· D_OCstub2(d,RL,XL)
· D_SCstub1(d,RL,XL)
· D_SCstub2(d,RL,XL)
the RL constraint would imply that there would be need for a really long transmission line for really small RL values, or that there would be need for really short transmission line when attempting to match large RL values.
Numerical and symbolic equations are supplied. For the numerical case 2D slice
is not as meaningful as visualizing the volume with both a static and a shifting plane
John BG
jgb2012@sky.com
