# Why does a voltage Divider need two resistors?

Discussion in 'General Electronics Chat' started by nmcclana, Jul 8, 2008.

1. ### nmcclana Thread Starter New Member

Jun 30, 2008
1
0
When I read the section on Voltage Dividers, it makes sense that the voltage potential drops as you test each successive resistor. What confuses me is when I look at the voltage divider diagram on Wikipedia.

Electrons are coming up from the ground, some of them decide to go up to Vin, and some decide to go to Vout. In the diagram, Z1 makes sense because, it acts to resist some of the electrons from going up to Vin, diverting some of them to Vout. The part that doesn't make sense is Z2. Why does that have to be there?

In the water analogy, the flow is diverted down two different pipes, and Z1 lets you control the size of the diverting pipe. Why must you slow down the water flow with Z2?

2. ### blocco a spirale AAC Fanatic!

Jun 18, 2008
1,535
412
What you're really trying to do with a voltage divider is produce a Vout which is largely independent of load. By choosing Z1 and Z2 so that the current through them is significantly greater than that drawn from Vout this can be achieved. e.g choose Z1 and Z2 for a current 100 times greater than drawn from Vout.

Voltage dividers are only practical for setting Vouts where very small currents are required.

3. ### HellTriX Active Member

Apr 11, 2008
83
1

What if you connected a load from Vout and up to the positive side?
The bottom resistor would restrict the flow to that Vout load. Conversely if you connected the load from Vout to ground the top resistor would restrict the flow. The biggest problem with voltage dividers is, if you start added a load to the positive side or the negative side at the Vout. You start added parallel resistance to either the top or the bottom resistors of the voltage divider so the Vout will change voltage because of that. (not regulated)

You would need to have a stable output load resistance and calculate the total voltage based on all the parallel resistances.

Hope this helps.

4. ### studiot AAC Fanatic!

Nov 9, 2007
5,003
522
Just remember in the water analogy the flow is analogous to electric current, not voltage.

In the water analogy the analogous property to voltage is usually taken as pressure.
This analogy is not perfect but is OK for your purposes.

When you follow this analogy the pressure is divided between the two pipes in just the same way as the voltage is divided between the two impedances.

5. ### Dave Retired Moderator

Nov 17, 2003
6,960
170
Without Z2, Vout is at the same potential as ground. To use the water analogy, this would mean the Vout pipe is in the ground-reservoir.

I always feel that voltage dividers are best considered using conventional current flow.

Dave

6. ### SgtWookie Expert

Jul 17, 2007
22,201
1,809
Ask yourself what happens when you divide a number by 1?

The same thing happens in electronics. If you divide an input voltage with just 1 resistor, you get the input voltage as the output.

7. ### thingmaker3 Retired Moderator

May 16, 2005
5,073
8
Actually, the electrons would be coming in to Vout and up through Z1.

Perhaps this will help clear things up: http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_6/1.html

8. ### m4yh3m AAC Fanatic!

Apr 28, 2004
186
43
but why wouldn't they go to ground since it's the path of least resistance?

9. ### thingmaker3 Retired Moderator

May 16, 2005
5,073
8
Because electrons flow from a more negative potential to a more positive potential. The amount of charge flowing through a given path will, of course, be inversely proportional to the resistance of said path.