In a few past conversations I think on another board...I was presented with the ideas based upon...Flatland...a book written by Edwin A. Abbott.
A few people started telling me how we would be able to veiw 2-D objects or constructs in our Universal Space/Time from infront...inback...but if veiwed from the side it would not exist.
Now this is sheer Fantasy.
Fist of all a 2-D OBJECT cannot exist as for the Matter and Energy to exist that makes up an object there must be more than 4 Dimensonal States and most likely a minimum 10 or 11-D.
Also I had issue with such statements as one said to me..."Look at this." He showed me a representation of a 5-D object. He also stated that 2-D was taking a pen and drawing a figure or line.
I explained to him that just the fact that you are able to draw on a piece of paper shows that the paper is made up of matter and thus has more than 4-D as well as the ink that is being written upon the paper.
I then told him that I had teachers and one Professor who held up a picture of what they said was a representation of a 5-D object...as well as a 6-D, 7-D...etc. I argued this till I was blue in the face and told them that even though I was aware the drawing was simply ment to represent such multi-dimensional objects...it still was really not representing them as was their possible reality.
Such is the folly of using pen and paper to design a geometric figure and say...This is 5-D. When everything about what a 5-D object would be could not possibly exist in our Universal Reality and neither could the Matter we know and understand be constructed in such a fashion.
Split Infinity
A few people started telling me how we would be able to veiw 2-D objects or constructs in our Universal Space/Time from infront...inback...but if veiwed from the side it would not exist.
Now this is sheer Fantasy.
Fist of all a 2-D OBJECT cannot exist as for the Matter and Energy to exist that makes up an object there must be more than 4 Dimensonal States and most likely a minimum 10 or 11-D.
Also I had issue with such statements as one said to me..."Look at this." He showed me a representation of a 5-D object. He also stated that 2-D was taking a pen and drawing a figure or line.
I explained to him that just the fact that you are able to draw on a piece of paper shows that the paper is made up of matter and thus has more than 4-D as well as the ink that is being written upon the paper.
I then told him that I had teachers and one Professor who held up a picture of what they said was a representation of a 5-D object...as well as a 6-D, 7-D...etc. I argued this till I was blue in the face and told them that even though I was aware the drawing was simply ment to represent such multi-dimensional objects...it still was really not representing them as was their possible reality.
Such is the folly of using pen and paper to design a geometric figure and say...This is 5-D. When everything about what a 5-D object would be could not possibly exist in our Universal Reality and neither could the Matter we know and understand be constructed in such a fashion.
Split Infinity