Please elaborate, as I have a 4G phone that is a heck of a lot faster when it indicates a 4G signal vs. a 3G signal.Be careful not to be led into believing such a thing actually exists. The promises of 3G have not yet been delivered, let alone 4G....
He's from Canada.. Nuff saidPlease elaborate, as I have a 4G phone that is a heck of a lot faster when it indicates a 4G signal vs. a 3G signal.
if your 4G speed isnt at least 100Mb/sec, then it's technically not 4G. If it's faster then 3Mb/sec then it's realistically 4G according to what the phone companies want you to think.Please elaborate, as I have a 4G phone that is a heck of a lot faster when it indicates a 4G signal vs. a 3G signal.
From Wikipedia:if your 4G speed isnt at least 100Mb/sec, then it's technically not 4G. If it's faster then 3Mb/sec then it's realistically 4G according to what the phone companies want you to think.
So, according the the governing organization, even a system not fully compliant can be considered 4G. Just saying.Since the first-release versions of Mobile WiMAX and LTE support much less than 1 Gbit/s peak bit rate, they are not fully IMT-Advanced compliant, but are often branded 4G by service providers. On December 6, 2010, ITU-R recognized that these two technologies, as well as other beyond-3G technologies that do not fulfill the IMT-Advanced requirements, could nevertheless be considered "4G", provided they represent forerunners to IMT-Advanced compliant versions and "a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed"