The following is the subject of moving frames at relativistic speed.
I am certain that most of serious science folks have heard of the whole thing about the Twin Paradox. So it is not necessary to describe what it is about so I will get to the meat of it.
The following reasons have been ruled out as to why one twin ages more than the other.
1. One was stationary and the other wasn't. Ruled out.
2. One was accelerating and the other wasn't. Ruled out.
3. One of them moved in two frames. Ruled out.
4. Doppler effect. Ruled out.
5. Depends on who is doing the measurment. Ruled out and out of context.
Explanation:
1. There are no preferred frame of reference as to who is stationary and who is moving. Everyone is stationary in their frame. Moving clocks runs slower, and therefore your clock always runs slower than mine even if you claim I am the one that is moving, well certainly you do. The traveling twin b begs to differe. He is stationary he claims and he has the right. I know you and I also don't agree with him, after all you and I are here stationary. Sure.
2. The traveling twin accelerted, decelerated twice, twice outward and twice inward. Acceleration has been fully debunked. You just have to google and read the twin paradox and all the rest along with all the experiments done.
3. The moving twin changed frames. It looks like it says something. It has no meaning. At which frame his clock began to run even more slow. It was moving slow from the moment he left according to the so called stationary twin. Accounting for 2 above also, to the traveling twin the stationary one changed frames. The first frame the earth was moving away and the second frame he was coming towards him. I.e. He saw earth moving away and coming towards him while he was stationary. Regardless of that changing frame is just that, something to say.
4. Doppler effect? The worse of all reasoning. It simply describes the objects direction with respect to the other and nothing else.
5. Who is doing the measurement...? someone was trying to pawn that off somewhere just to say something.
WHY DID THE TRAVELING TWIN UP ON RETURNING BACK TO EARTH AGED LESS?
Do you have another one you can throw in which I have not found anywhere yet? I have also read plenty other ones that make it look like they are saying something else other than what I have already covered. I am sorry, I have done plenty leg work and I will see through it and you should be glad that I do, so you can also toss it. It means someone pawned the wrong stuff just like they did me at least for awhile until I saw through it.
I have read the long long narrative on Wikipedia and elsewhere.... and you have to look very attentively to see that you are left empty handed and robbed of your time selling the appearanc of some goods. Just see if you are giving the above reasons but using different words... look closely.
[ I should throw this in just for the sake of being there to be read. It is sort of assumed subconsciously that when one hears this statement: " Moving clock runs slower" aside from seeing the other clock moving and not you because you of course don't see your clock run slow unless the battery is awfully low, the picture that comes to mind without consciously being aware is that the clock is moving away from you. No. no no. It is any clock that its position its distance changes from you no matter of the direction, so long as there is change in distance between you two, both see the other's clock run slower. And it is the other that is moving and not you].
[ Please make a note that the position of both twins are biased. Therefore neither one can draw worldline for the other. Therefore you can not draw worldline for them either. If you do then you have to explain where are you, what is your position, where are you looking from? who called on you to show each twin why you know more than they do?]
I am certain that most of serious science folks have heard of the whole thing about the Twin Paradox. So it is not necessary to describe what it is about so I will get to the meat of it.
The following reasons have been ruled out as to why one twin ages more than the other.
1. One was stationary and the other wasn't. Ruled out.
2. One was accelerating and the other wasn't. Ruled out.
3. One of them moved in two frames. Ruled out.
4. Doppler effect. Ruled out.
5. Depends on who is doing the measurment. Ruled out and out of context.
Explanation:
1. There are no preferred frame of reference as to who is stationary and who is moving. Everyone is stationary in their frame. Moving clocks runs slower, and therefore your clock always runs slower than mine even if you claim I am the one that is moving, well certainly you do. The traveling twin b begs to differe. He is stationary he claims and he has the right. I know you and I also don't agree with him, after all you and I are here stationary. Sure.
2. The traveling twin accelerted, decelerated twice, twice outward and twice inward. Acceleration has been fully debunked. You just have to google and read the twin paradox and all the rest along with all the experiments done.
3. The moving twin changed frames. It looks like it says something. It has no meaning. At which frame his clock began to run even more slow. It was moving slow from the moment he left according to the so called stationary twin. Accounting for 2 above also, to the traveling twin the stationary one changed frames. The first frame the earth was moving away and the second frame he was coming towards him. I.e. He saw earth moving away and coming towards him while he was stationary. Regardless of that changing frame is just that, something to say.
4. Doppler effect? The worse of all reasoning. It simply describes the objects direction with respect to the other and nothing else.
5. Who is doing the measurement...? someone was trying to pawn that off somewhere just to say something.
WHY DID THE TRAVELING TWIN UP ON RETURNING BACK TO EARTH AGED LESS?
Do you have another one you can throw in which I have not found anywhere yet? I have also read plenty other ones that make it look like they are saying something else other than what I have already covered. I am sorry, I have done plenty leg work and I will see through it and you should be glad that I do, so you can also toss it. It means someone pawned the wrong stuff just like they did me at least for awhile until I saw through it.
I have read the long long narrative on Wikipedia and elsewhere.... and you have to look very attentively to see that you are left empty handed and robbed of your time selling the appearanc of some goods. Just see if you are giving the above reasons but using different words... look closely.
[ I should throw this in just for the sake of being there to be read. It is sort of assumed subconsciously that when one hears this statement: " Moving clock runs slower" aside from seeing the other clock moving and not you because you of course don't see your clock run slow unless the battery is awfully low, the picture that comes to mind without consciously being aware is that the clock is moving away from you. No. no no. It is any clock that its position its distance changes from you no matter of the direction, so long as there is change in distance between you two, both see the other's clock run slower. And it is the other that is moving and not you].
[ Please make a note that the position of both twins are biased. Therefore neither one can draw worldline for the other. Therefore you can not draw worldline for them either. If you do then you have to explain where are you, what is your position, where are you looking from? who called on you to show each twin why you know more than they do?]
Last edited: