People can type and think at different rates but lets get an upper bound.
for example using this
The only reasonable way of completing major/large programs would be to work in teams efficiently enough to out weigh this single person limit.
The only other ways are computer automation or creating a more higher level
language to do it for us.
Each has its downside/upsides since the higher level language abstracts flow of code and complete understanding so in some since harder to debug in some cases.
But faster to produce more code. The former adding people can be good and bad based on arguments or disagreements as well as usability issues.
So what I say is let the computer do the programming for you.
Some day maybe we can create an AI based computer that we can speak to it in english and it can program the program for us.
So some day codebases are going to become to complex, and other things as well with computers to do in a reasonable amount of time thats when the computer must somehow be programmed by computers.
And that my friends is what I call artificial life.
Of course the computer will never be as smart as us But then again thats not proven yet
for example using this
Now its just simple math to work out how much code can be written or in theory words produced. This is are bound on how fast we as a single person can develop. That and factoring in thinking makes it a very slow process to complete a large project.Using the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard, she has maintained 150 wpm for 50 minutes, and 170 wpm for shorter periods. She has been clocked at a peak speed of 212 wpm. Blackburn, who failed her QWERTY typing class in high school, first encountered the Dvorak keyboard in 1938, quickly learned to achieve very high speeds, and occasionally toured giving speed-typing demonstrations during her secretarial career
The only reasonable way of completing major/large programs would be to work in teams efficiently enough to out weigh this single person limit.
The only other ways are computer automation or creating a more higher level
language to do it for us.
Each has its downside/upsides since the higher level language abstracts flow of code and complete understanding so in some since harder to debug in some cases.
But faster to produce more code. The former adding people can be good and bad based on arguments or disagreements as well as usability issues.
So what I say is let the computer do the programming for you.
Some day maybe we can create an AI based computer that we can speak to it in english and it can program the program for us.
So some day codebases are going to become to complex, and other things as well with computers to do in a reasonable amount of time thats when the computer must somehow be programmed by computers.
And that my friends is what I call artificial life.
Of course the computer will never be as smart as us But then again thats not proven yet
Last edited: