If you combine that with the Russo's cold fusion device we now have a source of energy to fold spacetime and to control the universe with our planet destroying machines.What the? ... is this for real? ... are you pulling my leg, NSA?
Ok... now I get it... thanks...If you combine that with the Russo's cold fusion device we now have a source of energy to fold spacetime and to control the universe with our planet destroying machines.
Friends don't let friends use reactionless drives in science fiction.Are you guys aware that the emdrive had a starring role in a summer filler TV show called Salvation? I was surprised. It's probably the best use of the thing.
However, a little thing like violating a law of physics isn't going to stop the crack-pots. Face it, the second law of thermodynamics hasn't stopped all the people attempting to create perpetual motion machines of the first kind.
YesAre they being duped? Or are they on to something?
Yes, they are on something. Our Emdrive to save the planet is so much better.Are they being duped? Or are they on to something?
http://www.iflscience.com/space/chinese-media-appear-to-show-their-impossible-emdrive-thruster/
Chinese scientists say they are making more and more progress on this "impossible engine".
what?
More likely they've found a source of credit that their bank won't reject...Have they found a frequency that space won't except?
The study can be read online and is published in the Journal of Applied Physical Science International, although the publisher doesn’t appear to have a stellar reputation.
The eurhythmic interpretation of quantum mechanics.
I believe you, though maybe there's still the chance it could work on a different and little understood principle? ... I'm looking forward to the Chinese test ...The eurhythmic interpretation of quantum mechanics.
If true that makes it a perpetual motion machine as has been discussed before so on the first principles of no free lunch, I'm not buying it. We get physics busting theories, and no credible data.
Especially since it's not NASA's engine....I thought it was bad journalism for the article to be titled "NASA's impossible engine"
That much is clear:He says he's agnostic about the (crackpot) theories but they are plainly and clearly wrong at the most basic level. I guess if psychic powers were investigated then this is a normal operation to put the dagger in this nonsense.
It's an excuse to play with new toys with the tax payers money. He knows and says (one in a million chance to win a billion playing the lotto) they expect to see zero actual (new physics) thrust from the device. It is a good chance to improve the measurement platform for other low thrust devices the NRL actually works on for space based systems.That much is clear:
The big question for me here is, if this is all crackpot, why is this guy, who's got such respectable credentials, invesitng so much of his time in it?
Bingo. It's not acceptable in any field that there can be devices like the emdrive persisting for so long without being dismissed, and ideally explained, by careful experimentation. Pons and Fleischman observe something unexpected and the world goes crazy trying to replicate and/or explain the observation. That's the good part. The bad part was jumping to the conclusion that a new physics has been discovered. That should always be the last hypothesis, not the first one.It is a good chance to improve the measurement platform for other low thrust devices the NRL actually works on for space based systems.