Solving First Order RL circuit

Thread Starter

TripleDeuce

Joined Sep 20, 2010
26
http://img713.imageshack.us/i/39642770.jpg

At time t = 0_

The circuit looks like the voltage source in series with R1 and R2 with the inductor acting like a short circuit.

iL (0_) = 60V/50Ω = 1.2A

At t = 0+

The circuit looks like

http://img839.imageshack.us/i/52735488.jpg

Would iL(0 +) be a different current or the same? I have a feeling it would be the same.

It is true that the inductance current remains the same right before and right after the switch is activated because the current through the inductor can't change instantaneously right?

Any help on solving fr IL( 0+) and iL(t) would be appreciated
 

syed_husain

Joined Aug 24, 2009
61
yes, iL(0-)=iL(0+). now just apply node analysis. consider node "a" ground to make calculation easier. u will able to find the iL(t). hope this helps.
 

Thread Starter

TripleDeuce

Joined Sep 20, 2010
26
I make a node called V1 where the three resistors intersect each other and another node called VL above the inductor

The node equation for V1 is

(V1-60)/30 + V1/60 + (V1-VL)/20 = 0

V1/30 - 2 + V1/60 + V1/20 - VL/20 = 0

The node equation for VL is

(VL-V1)/20 + 1.2 = 0

VL/20 = V1/20 - 1.2

VL = V1 -24

Plugging that back in the node equation for V1

V1/30 - 2 + V1/60 + V1/20 - (V1-24)/20 = 0

V1/30 - 2 + V1/60 + V1/20 - V1/20 + 24/20 = 0

V1 = -24

so VL = -24 - 24 = -48V ?

I have a feeling something is wrong.
 

syed_husain

Joined Aug 24, 2009
61
The node equation for VL is (VL-V1)/20 + 1.2 = 0 .[/QUOTE said:
that equa is wrong bcos 1.2 is the initial current not the current after time "t". so it will be

(VL-V1)/20 +iL(t)= 0

calculate V1 from this then plug this V1 value in equn 1. then in use the voltage current relationship ofminductor VL=L(diL/dt). now u will have 1st order diff equn. use the initial cond of iL(t) there.
 

Vahe

Joined Mar 3, 2011
75
Since this is a first-order transient problem, the solution for the inductor current for \( t \ge 0\)will be of the following form

\(
i_L(t) = i_L(\infty) + [ i_L(0^+) - i_L(\infty) ] e^{-t/\tau}
\)

where \( i_L(0^+)\) is the current in the inductor right after the switch is closed. Since there are no impulse sources in the circuit, the inductor current is continuous and therefore \(i_L(0^+)= i_L(0^-)\). Current \(i_L(0^-)\) is the inductor current right before the switch is closed. The current \(i_L(\infty)\) is the value of the inductor current after the switch has been closed for a long time. The time constant \(\tau=L/R_{th}\), where \(R_{th}\) is the Thevenin resistance seen by the inductor in the circuit after the switch is closed.

Looking at the circuit before the switch is closed and assuming that the switch has been open for a long time, we can assume dc steady steady (L is a short circuit); therefore,

\(
i_L(0^-) = \frac{V_s}{R_1+R_2}=\frac{60V}{50\Omega}=\frac{6}{5}\text{A}
\)

Since the inductor current is continuous over the switching action. We have that \(i_L(0^+) = \frac{6}{5}\text{A}\). After the switch is closed for a long time, we reach another dc steady state and the inductor is once again a short circuit. First we determine the current \(i_s\) out of the + terminal of the voltage source as

\(
i_s = \frac{V_s}{R_1 + R_2 || R_3}=\frac{60V}{30\Omega+15\Omega}=\frac{4}{3} \text{A}
\)

This is also the current going through \(R_1\) from left to right. Now with the inductor being a short circuit, the current that we seek can be given by current division.

\(
i_L(\infty)= \frac{R_3}{R_2 + R_3} i_s=\frac{60\Omega}{80\Omega} \, (\frac{4}{3}) \text{A}=1\text{A}
\)

The resistance \(R_{th}\) is found by turning off the voltage source and finding the resistance "seen" by the inductor.

\(
R_{th}=R_2 + R_1||R_3 = 20 + 30||60 = 40 \Omega
\tau = L/R_{th} = 0.4mH/40\Omega = 10\mu s
\)

Therefore the solution is

\(
i_L(t) = 1 + 0.2 e^{-100,000t} \text{ for } t \ge 0
i_L(t) = 1.2 \text{ for } t < 0
\)

I will leave you to calculate \(v_L=L di_L/dt\) :)
Hopefully, I have not made any calculation errors :(

Cheers,
Vahe
 
Top