Depends. Your question is not clear. What is your application? Show us a circuit.
One does not usually charge a capacitor just for the sake of charging a capacitor except perhaps in a laboratory experiment.
A capacitor has many other useful functions in an electronic circuit, the least of which is just to put a charge in it.
Application is just to charge a capacitor. (for my understanding)
Just wondering why in all of the circuits i have seen, they always put a resistor in series with the capacitor. In the charging equation V = Vo[1-e-(t/RC)] why not just put R = 0.
e-(t/RC) would eventually become 0 and Vo[1-0] = V (100% charged).
Basically why not just a capacitor and voltage source in series rather than a voltage source, resistor and capacitor in series.
The main reason for having the resistor in an RC experiment is so that you can study the exponential rise and fall of the voltage on a voltmeter or oscilloscope.
Without the resistor the time-constant would be too short to observe even on a fast oscilloscope.
On paper, the lack of a resistor would result in an infinite current for an infinitesimal amount of time. In a real circuit, there will always be some parasitic resistance, if nothing else, but it may be low enough that the resulting currents are high enough to cause problems. If so, then additional actual resistance needs to be added. If not, then call it good.