Can someone please help me understand how the introduction of a screen grid between the anode and control grid reduces the Miller Effect feedback capacitance between them?
There are plenty of web resources on how to design with a tetrode and how to connect the screen grid (even in AAC own pages). I understand how to design with the screen grid and the beneficial effect it would have on extending frequency response, BUT I don't see how the screen grid reduces the unwanted capacitance between the control grid and anode, that exists in a triode valve.
So it's held at a potential similar to the anode and is shorted to earth by a capacitor - all that means is that some of the ac signal of interest never makes it to the anode (though aparently it only takes a fraction of the signal), how does that reduce the parasitic capacitance?
It's a bit like trying to reduce the collector base capacitance in a common emitter BJT circuit I suppose.
Thanks for any light you can shed on this.
There are plenty of web resources on how to design with a tetrode and how to connect the screen grid (even in AAC own pages). I understand how to design with the screen grid and the beneficial effect it would have on extending frequency response, BUT I don't see how the screen grid reduces the unwanted capacitance between the control grid and anode, that exists in a triode valve.
So it's held at a potential similar to the anode and is shorted to earth by a capacitor - all that means is that some of the ac signal of interest never makes it to the anode (though aparently it only takes a fraction of the signal), how does that reduce the parasitic capacitance?
It's a bit like trying to reduce the collector base capacitance in a common emitter BJT circuit I suppose.
Thanks for any light you can shed on this.