Hi,
Just curious if keeping it simple and using a resistive voltage divider to keep an input signal below the level that will damage a sound card, followed by a buffer >> sound card, can give reasonable results when using one of the common PC O'scopes (Visual Analyser).
I intend on using this for audio frequency waveform viewing (say, 100Hz - 10 or 15kHz); very little need for actual 'measurement' in any quantitative way. I'm looking for such things as the onset of clipping, phase differences, what different filters do to changing frequencies in the real world and that kind of thing.
I've read the large post from Bill Marsden et. al. where they try to create a 'real' input section...I'd like to go much more simple than that if possible, but have no real clue what the pitfalls are (beyond killing the soundcard). Like, what are the most likely things to get 'skewed' just because of the nature of the input? How am I going to be 'fooled', y'know...
Thanks for any information!
Just curious if keeping it simple and using a resistive voltage divider to keep an input signal below the level that will damage a sound card, followed by a buffer >> sound card, can give reasonable results when using one of the common PC O'scopes (Visual Analyser).
I intend on using this for audio frequency waveform viewing (say, 100Hz - 10 or 15kHz); very little need for actual 'measurement' in any quantitative way. I'm looking for such things as the onset of clipping, phase differences, what different filters do to changing frequencies in the real world and that kind of thing.
I've read the large post from Bill Marsden et. al. where they try to create a 'real' input section...I'd like to go much more simple than that if possible, but have no real clue what the pitfalls are (beyond killing the soundcard). Like, what are the most likely things to get 'skewed' just because of the nature of the input? How am I going to be 'fooled', y'know...
Thanks for any information!