That's not correct.\(\frac{U_0}{I_s}=R_3(\frac{R_1}{R_2}+\frac{R_1}{R_3}-1)\)
Can someone check me?
No one said there is no current in R3. How did you conclude that?Ok. So. There is no current in R3? Then U0=R2(Is)?
I am just stumbling in the dark. When I solved it the first time, I thought R2 and R3 would act as current divider, that was shut down. Now I am out of ideas.No one said there is no current in R3. How did you conclude that?
Are you the same person as regexp?I am just stumbling in the dark. When I solved it the first time, I thought R2 and R3 would act as current divider, that was shut down. Now I am out of ideas.
I see what you mean. I think I can do node equations on the original circuit.Here's a tip:
You can convert the T-pad network to a PI-pad network using the Y-Δ transformation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wye-delta
Or you could just write out your node equations
Is = ( Va - Vb) /R1 (1)
Is = Vb/R2 + (Vb - Vout)/R3 (2)
Va = 0V ( thanks to op amp "action" )
The output voltage is bound to be negative, due to the direction of the current and the feedback.The minus sign looks wrong. Everything else looks right.
Put your money where your mouth is.The minus sign looks wrong. Everything else looks right.
by Jake Hertz
by Duane Benson
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz