measured value of output power of max2750 is very low compared to the value given in the datasheet

Thread Starter

Hadia35

Joined May 25, 2017
16
I am currently making an Rf transmitter which works on 2.4GHz and the main goal is to achieve 1 watt of power at the transmitting end. I am using max2750 as my vco for the project and have made its evaluation board according to the design given in the datasheet. Now the problem which i am facing is the on the spectrum analyzer i am only seeing a single peak of 2.4GHz having an amplitude of -32dbm which is very small compare to the actual output power of -3dBm. why is that ? and what can be the solution for it? I am also attaching the picture of the hardware of the vco
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Thread Starter

Hadia35

Joined May 25, 2017
16
The power am talking about is the output power of max2750 which is measured by a spectrum analyzer. Right now i am only measuring the power of the vco module not the whole circuit so at the moment there is no antenna attached however i will be designing a patch antenna in order to measure the 1 watt transmitting power of the Rf transmitter
 

drc_567

Joined Dec 29, 2008
1,156
Would it be appropriate to connect a suitable 'dummy' load resistor at the overall circuit output? ... Possibly connect the analyzer by means of a 'T' connector?
 

BR-549

Joined Sep 22, 2013
4,928
We assume you have checked pcb pad/trace isolation and proper voltage is getting to chip.

Have you built GHz circuits before?
 

Thread Starter

Hadia35

Joined May 25, 2017
16
Thus i
We assume you have checked pcb pad/trace isolation and proper voltage is getting to chip.

Have you built GHz circuits before?[/QUOT
We assume you have checked pcb pad/trace isolation and proper voltage is getting to chip.

Have you built GHz circuits before?
this is my first time building a GHz circuit . I am also in a doubt about my pcb layout because when i apply the shutdown logic gate unit voltage the power supply providing Vcc becomes short
 

BR-549

Joined Sep 22, 2013
4,928
Ok....thanks. Microwave frequencies used to be the voodoo of electronics. That means its voodoo to me. Although I'm quite sure there have been many improvements. With a little study and practice you should be able to master it. There are MW experts on here.....not sure how elementary they go.

MW circuits are finicky and need to be exact. Can you afford to purchase a premade board?

That might be the way to go. Especially with the oscillator. Maybe the PA board could be a first construction project?

Sorry I can't help you more. It's out of my league.
 

Thread Starter

Hadia35

Joined May 25, 2017
16
Ok....thanks. Microwave frequencies used to be the voodoo of electronics. That means its voodoo to me. Although I'm quite sure there have been many improvements. With a little study and practice you should be able to master it. There are MW experts on here.....not sure how elementary they go.

MW circuits are finicky and need to be exact. Can you afford to purchase a premade board?

That might be the way to go. Especially with the oscillator. Maybe the PA board could be a first construction project?

Sorry I can't help you more. It's out of my league.
I can buy the premade board but i really want to make the board myself. Anyways, thank you for looking into my problem
 

bertus

Joined Apr 5, 2008
22,278
Hello,

Is your PCB also double sided as in the PDF?
Did you see all the spots on the component layout?

MAX2750_PCB.png

Those are via's , connections between top and bottom layer.

Bertus
 

Thread Starter

Hadia35

Joined May 25, 2017
16
Yes the pcb is double-sided and about the the vias there are only two holes in my pcb layout and they have been filled with copper. Someone told me that the true response can also come with less number of via but if not they can be drilled later in the layout. So can less number of vias be the reason for a very low output power ?
 
As I came upon this post, I think it is relevant. It's not about my immediate problem, but as it had no good answer, perhaps my input is helpful.
 
Top