But, based on experience, the mods would not just assume that the members ignoring other members are righteous and justified. We look at each case individually and do so without regard to who is reporting it. If you were to look at out discussions you would find that they are replete with instances where we agree with and defend members whom we, personally, have long-standing problems with and other instances where we disagree with members who we generally are on the same page with. If such a feature existed, I have high confidence that we would use it only as a pointer to member that we might want to take a look at, but any decisions regarding that member would be based on his or her actions.It also creates an echo chamber filled with like minded people, of clicks, of intolerance, otherwise known as mobs.
Such actions essentially assume that those members decisions are righteous and justified, without any prior justification.
Each member should be judged on his or her actions, not the actions or reactions of other members..
Plus, when you think about it, is this really any different than the present system of having the Report option? Doesn't that create exactly the same kind of echo chamber that you are suggesting? Most mod actions against members are the result of reports and there are actually only a small number of members that take the time to submit reports, so it certainly could, but again, I think the mods do a pretty good job of looking at each reported post and the report content on its own merits on a case by case basis. Even when we get a member that is on a reporting spree and reporting every little thing they can think of, most of which are frivolous, we look at each one to spot the ones that are actually legitimate (there are almost always at least some of them) and act on them accordingly.